farm near Danville VA
Farm sprinkler distribution-uniformity + leak audit, near Danville VA.
Test the farm's irrigation system near Danville, VA for distribution uniformity and leaks with a catch-can audit. Read all of it
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $360 proposed.
Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
- Proofcatch-can grid photo + GPS + DU + pressure + leak/head note + schedule
- Open until2027-07-10
- Leveladvanced
All of it: the words, the place, the proof
Test the farm's irrigation system near Danville, VA for distribution uniformity and leaks with a catch-can audit. A farm near Danville VA draws scarce water for irrigation with no distribution-uniformity data; poor uniformity and leaks waste water and stress crops, but the system has never been catch-can tested.
Fund it for $360. The receipt lands onchain once the proof is approved.
Safety, read before you claim
Needs someone able to run a catch-can uniformity test, plus the farm's access permission; no licence or supervision is asked. Never make repairs; work in the early morning to avoid heat, and tell someone your plan at remote sites.
How this work is done
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Bring
- matched catch cans (or cups)
- measuring cylinder / ruler
- pressure gauge
- stopwatch
- GPS phone
- camera
- data sheet
Steps
- 1. Confirm the site/zone; record GPS; identify the system type (sprinkler / drip / micro).
- 2. Sprinkler zones: lay catch cans on a grid across the zone, run the zone a fixed time, and measure the water depth in each can.
- 3. Compute distribution uniformity (low-quarter DU) from the catch-can depths.
- 4. Drip/micro zones: measure emitter flow at several points (fill a container over a fixed time) and inspect for clogs and leaks.
- 5. Read operating pressure at the zone; note leaks, broken/misaligned heads, and overspray onto pavement.
- 6. Review the run schedule against plant/soil need (over/under-watering, runoff).
- 7. Rank fixes (head repair, pressure regulation, schedule change) by water savings; record DU/emitter flow, pressure, leaks, schedule note, photos; sign.
What counts as done
- Photos of catch-can layout + system
- GPS waypoint
- Distribution uniformity (low-quarter DU)
- Operating pressure
- Broken/leaking heads note
- Schedule-vs-need + ranked fixes
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1783716601980_dgjhywl","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.
Other acts: vote, pledge, fund
Packet WORK_1783716601980_dgjhywl