Audit the fellowship-kitchen food-service sustainability practices at Peoples Church

The fellowship kitchen runs a weekly community meal program that has never been scored against a sourcing/waste/seasonal-practice standard — the audit names where the real gains are. Standard: undefined Proof: photo set + completed scorecard + prioritized plan + GPS Method (undefined): 1. Walk the kitchen with the meal-program lead and photograph current sourcing, storage and waste practices. 2. Score the kitchen against the 7-criterion sustainability scorecard (sourcing, waste, energy, water, procurement, season, community). 3. Note current food-waste diversion status. 4. Compile the findings into a prioritized improvement plan. Done when: photo set + completed scorecard + prioritized plan + GPS

Where

Peoples Church, 7172 N Cedar Ave, Fresno, CA 93720

Pay

$80 proposed

This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash. You see which before you claim, never after.

Proof

photo set + completed scorecard + prioritized plan + GPS

This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.

Level

entry

Open until

2026-08-31

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it. Typically 60–120 minutes. Method of record: Michelin Green Star-style 7-criterion sustainability scorecard

Bring

• tablet/clipboard
• camera
• scale (waste weighing scope)
• 7-criterion rubric

Steps

1. 1. Confirm the site + address; arrange a staff escort for back-of-house.
2. 2. Photograph evidence for each criterion: sourcing, waste stream, energy, water, procurement records, seasonality, team practices.
3. 3. Score each of the 7 criteria against the rubric with an evidence note.
4. 4. For a waste audit, weigh or estimate food waste for one service and identify recovery/donation options.
5. 5. Rank the highest-impact improvement recommendations.
6. 6. Enter scores, evidence notes, waste data, recommendations, photos into the proof record; sign.

If it does not match the plan

• Food-safety or hygiene hazard observed -> note and defer to staff; documentation only.
• Significant edible waste -> recommend the EPA Food Recovery Hierarchy (donation before disposal).

What counts as done

• Score recorded for each of the 7 criteria with an evidence note
• Food-waste weight/volume recorded (waste-audit scope)
• Recovery/donation options identified (waste scope)
• Ranked improvement recommendations + photos + address confirm

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.