Bring the curb ramp up to ADA grade at the Roeding Park Belmont Ave entrance

The curb ramp at the park's main entrance exceeds ADA/PROWAG slope limits and lacks a detectable warning surface, blocking wheelchair and stroller access at the park's busiest crossing. Standard: undefined Proof: slope survey + permit + before/after photos + inspection pass + GPS Method (undefined): 1. Survey the existing ramp slope, cross-slope and landing against ADA/PROWAG R304 and photograph as found. 2. Saw-cut and remove the non-compliant ramp section. 3. Form and pour a compliant ramp with correct slope, landing and detectable warning surface per the permit plan. 4. Cure, inspect against the AHJ checklist, and photograph the finished, compliant ramp. Done when: slope survey + permit + before/after photos + inspection pass + GPS

Where

Roeding Park, 890 W Belmont Ave, Fresno, CA 93728

Pay

$210 proposed

This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash. You see which before you claim, never after.

Proof

slope survey + permit + before/after photos + inspection pass + GPS

This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.

Level

advanced

Open until

2026-09-01

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it. Typically 240–600 minutes. Method of record: Curb ramp repair/retrofit to ADA + PROWAG R304 (slope, landing, detectable warning surface), under municipal right-of-way permit — trained crew with wet-cut dust controls; assess→repair→verify

Bring

• right-of-way permit + cones/barricades + pedestrian detour signage
• smart level / digital inclinometer + tape measure
• concrete tools + detectable warning surface (truncated dome) panel per city standard
• wet-cut saw with water feed (dust control)

Steps

1. 1. ASSESS: measure the existing ramp against PROWAG R304 (running slope ≤8.3%, cross-slope ≤2%, landing, flush transition, detectable warning) and photograph each failure; confirm permit + utility locates before cutting.
2. 2. Set up cones/barricades and a safe pedestrian detour outside the work zone.
3. 3. Remove the failed ramp section with wet-cut dust controls; form and place the corrected ramp geometry per the city standard drawing.
4. 4. Set the detectable warning surface (truncated domes) aligned and embedded per spec; finish transitions flush with the gutter.
5. 5. VERIFY: re-measure every R304 dimension with the smart level, photograph readings + before/after from matching vantage, water-test the gutter flow line, and close out the permit.

If it does not match the plan

• No permit or no utility locate -> STOP: do not cut.
• Cutting without water-fed dust control -> STOP (respirable silica).
• Geometry cannot meet R304 within the existing footprint -> document and route to the city's ADA transition-plan engineer instead of pouring a non-compliant ramp.

What counts as done

• Measured running slope ≤8.3% and cross-slope ≤2% with level photos
• Detectable warning surface installed per standard (alignment + embed photos)
• Flush gutter transition verified (no lip >1/4 inch; water flows along the gutter line)
• Before/after photos + permit close-out reference

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.