Do the building efficiency work at a community building in Seattle, WA

A shared community building in Seattle, WA needs hands-on work to cut its energy, water, air, or material waste. This packet scopes and does that work so the building runs cleaner and cheaper. Standard: Michelin Green Star-style 7-criterion scorecard (sourcing, waste, energy, water, procurement, seasonality, team). Proof: before/after photos + signage photo + first-week diversion log + GPS Method (Michelin Green Star-style 7-criterion scorecard (sourcing, waste, energy, water, procurement, seasonality, team).): 1. Walk the cafeteria line with the food-service manager and identify the share-table location (accessible, refrigerated for cold items, in view of staff). 2. Set up labeled share bins/coolers with simple signage on what can and can't go on the table. 3. Train cafeteria staff and a few student volunteers on the routine (place, monitor, clear at period end). 4. Photograph the finished setup and log the first week's diverted-item count with the manager. Done when: Before/after photos of the cafeteria share-table setup; Signage photo; First-week diverted-item count signed by the food-service manager

Where

a community building in Seattle, WA

Pay

$220 proposed

This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash. You see which before you claim, never after.

Proof

before/after photos + signage photo + first-week diversion log + GPS

This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.

Level

entry

Open until

2026-09-14

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it. Typically 60–120 minutes. Method of record: Michelin Green Star-style 7-criterion sustainability scorecard

Bring

• tablet/clipboard
• camera
• scale (waste weighing scope)
• 7-criterion rubric

Steps

1. 1. Confirm the site + address; arrange a staff escort for back-of-house.
2. 2. Photograph evidence for each criterion: sourcing, waste stream, energy, water, procurement records, seasonality, team practices.
3. 3. Score each of the 7 criteria against the rubric with an evidence note.
4. 4. For a waste audit, weigh or estimate food waste for one service and identify recovery/donation options.
5. 5. Rank the highest-impact improvement recommendations.
6. 6. Enter scores, evidence notes, waste data, recommendations, photos into the proof record; sign.

If it does not match the plan

• Food-safety or hygiene hazard observed -> note and defer to staff; documentation only.
• Significant edible waste -> recommend the EPA Food Recovery Hierarchy (donation before disposal).

What counts as done

• Score recorded for each of the 7 criteria with an evidence note
• Food-waste weight/volume recorded (waste-audit scope)
• Recovery/donation options identified (waste scope)
• Ranked improvement recommendations + photos + address confirm

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.