Document a brush encroached rangeland segment near Coleman, site 1, a resident's own rural property near Coleman, TX 76834, Coleman County, with the owner's consent, or the adjacent public county road right of way (mesquite and redberry juniper encroached rangeland segment) (2026-07-31)

This Coleman County rangeland segment is densely encroached by mesquite or redberry juniper with no photo record to prioritize it for licensed structural thinning that would recover native rangeland grass cover. Standard: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department rangeland brush management guidance plus USDA NRCS conservation practice standard 314 brush management (structural thinning of mesquite and redberry juniper for rangeland grass recovery), applied here to Coleman County rangeland near the Callahan Divide. SDG 15.1 and 15.3. Proof: document only observation log plus brush density note plus GPS plus ranked follow on note plus owner or right of way consent record Method (Texas Parks and Wildlife Department rangeland brush management guidance plus USDA NRCS conservation practice standard 314 brush management (structural thinning of mesquite and redberry juniper for rangeland grass recovery), applied here to Coleman County rangeland near the Callahan Divide. SDG 15.1 and 15.3.): 1. 1. From the public county road right of way, or from the entrance of this resident's own rural property with the owner's consent, photograph a mesquite or redberry juniper encroached rangeland segment without operating any equipment. 2. 2. Note the approximate density and type of woody brush encroachment and whether native rangeland grass cover remains beneath. 3. 3. Photograph the site from a fixed reference point for future comparison. 4. 4. Record a ranked follow on note naming the segment for the licensed brush thinning crew, never operating brush cutting equipment on this rung. Done when: Written or recorded permission from the property owner, or confirmation the observation was made from the public road right of way; Photo of the brush encroached segment taken without operating any equipment; Note of the approximate brush density and whether native rangeland grass cover remains beneath; Ranked follow on note naming the segment for the licensed brush thinning crew

Where

a resident's own rural property near Coleman, TX 76834, Coleman County, with the owner's consent, or the adjacent public county road right of way (mesquite and redberry juniper encroached rangeland segment)

Pay

$85 proposed

This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash. You see which before you claim, never after.

Proof

document only observation log plus brush density note plus GPS plus ranked follow on note plus owner or right of way consent record

This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.

Level

entry

Open until

2026-10-30

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it. Typically 60–120 minutes. Method of record: USDA NRCS Conservation Practice Standard 528 (Prescribed Grazing) — field transect assessment + rotational-grazing infrastructure planning

Bring

• GPS-capable phone
• camera
• measuring tape or pace-count reference
• step-point/line-transect data sheet
• field notebook

Steps

1. 1. Walk representative transects across the pasture's distinct zones with the landowner/rancher, photographing ground cover, bare patches and forage species mix at each point.
2. 2. Estimate percent ground cover and forage utilization at 10+ points using a step-point or line-transect method, recording GPS per point.
3. 3. Note any erosion, invasive species presence, or water-point degradation observed along the transects.
4. 4. Compile the baseline sheet naming the follow-on practice per zone (cross-fencing for rotation, reseeding, water development) against the NRCS CPS 528 target.

If it does not match the plan

• Ground cover below 50% in a zone with active livestock access -> flag for rest/rotation via cross-fencing before further stocking.
• Erosion or bare-soil connectivity observed along a slope -> flag the zone as a reseeding/soil-health priority.
• Invasive species covering more than 20% of a transect -> name it in the baseline sheet for a follow-on control plan.

What counts as done

• 10+ transect points photographed with GPS
• Ground-cover/forage-utilization estimate recorded per point
• Baseline sheet compiled naming a follow-on practice for every zone scoring below target

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.