← Board

Reserva Ecologica de la Ciudad Universitaria UNL (puntos fijos), Santa Fe, AR

Relevar el estado del humedal de la reserva con metodo rapido | Survey the reserve's wetland condition with the rapid method.

La reserva necesita una lectura repetible de su humedal para poder mostrar si la restauracion mejora algo, y hoy solo tiene impresiones. Read all of it

Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $300 proposed.

Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
  • ProofGPS por punto + planilla del metodo rapido + fotos en la misma direccion + serie archivada | GPS per point plus the rapid-method sheet plus photos facing the same way plus the filed series
  • Open until2026-11-18
  • Levelintermediate
All of it: the words, the place, the proof

La reserva necesita una lectura repetible de su humedal para poder mostrar si la restauracion mejora algo, y hoy solo tiene impresiones. El metodo rapido, aplicado siempre igual, arma esa serie. | English: The reserve needs a repeatable read of its wetland to be able to show whether restoration improves anything, and today it has only impressions. The rapid method, applied the same way each time, builds that series.

Fund it for $300. Proof lands onchain when it's done.

What it looks like
A surveyor sets a quadrat frame at the wetland edge at Reserva Ecologica de la Ciudad Universitaria UNL (puntos fijos) and photographs the plants inside it, logging percent cover.

A description of this kind of work, not a record that it happened here.

Where
Reserva Ecologica de la Ciudad Universitaria UNL (puntos fijos), Santa Fe, AR. Open the map
Pay
$300 proposed

This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash: recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.

Proof
GPS por punto + planilla del metodo rapido + fotos en la misma direccion + serie archivada | GPS per point plus the rapid-method sheet plus photos facing the same way plus the filed series

This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.

Level
intermediate
Open until
2026-11-18
Posted by
0x034F…6c89

The creator wallet. Its signature is what approves proof and settles the wage.

How this work is done

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.

Steps

  1. 1. Fijar con el equipo los puntos de evaluacion y registrarlos con GPS. | Fix the assessment points with the team and record them with GPS.
  2. 2. Evaluar en cada punto hidrologia, vegetacion y alteracion del borde. | Assess hydrology, vegetation and edge disturbance at each point.
  3. 3. Fotografiar cada punto en la misma direccion que la vez anterior. | Photograph each point facing the same way as last time.
  4. 4. Cargar la planilla con fecha y clima y archivarla junto a la serie previa. | Fill the sheet with date and weather and file it alongside the previous series.

What counts as done

  • Coordenadas GPS de cada punto de evaluacion | GPS coordinates of each assessment point
  • Planilla del metodo rapido completa por punto | Completed rapid-method sheet per point
  • Fotos de cada punto tomadas en la misma direccion que la serie anterior | Photos of each point taken facing the same way as the previous series

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.

The standard this serves

Wetland Condition. Wetlands are the landscape's kidneys and nurseries at once: they filter the water, absorb the flood, and raise the young of half the creatures around them. The EPA's rapid assessment gives a trained visitor a way to grade one honestly: the plants present, the water's path, the soil, the wear at the edges. Mastery looks like walking a marsh and knowing, defensibly, how it is doing and what threatens it. This packet is one such visit, one wetland's condition recorded to the method. What is watched can be defended; unwatched wetlands quietly disappear.

What is promised, and what is not

Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1787183300479_17n0yyc","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.

Open, but not claimable yet. The work qualification registry could not be read (registry file not found at /home/ubuntu/ecowealth-production-20260912/data/standards/work-qualification-v0.json), so no packet's requirements can be established. The requirement is a structured fact about this kind of work, not a line of the packet's text, and an attestation does not establish it. It is not claimable yet. It stays readable; voting and pledging are free, and funding is separate from claiming.

An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.

Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.

Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.

Other acts: vote, pledge, fund

Packet WORK_1787183300479_17n0yyc