Yuexiu Park (public open space, exact site not yet named), Guangzhou, CN
记录公共场地的树荫覆盖情况：越秀公园 | Record the canopy cover across the public site: Yuexiu Park.
哪里缺树荫,靠印象说不准。沿固定路线按同一规则记录树冠覆盖与缺口,下一批种树才知道该种在哪。这条工单只做记录。 | Where the shade is missing cannot be settled from impressions. Read all of it
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $80 proposed.
Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
- Proof固定间隔仰视照片 + 覆盖比例估值 + 无荫路段长度 + GPS 点 | canopy photos at fixed intervals + cover estimates + unshaded stretch lengths + GPS pins
- Open until2027-08-19
- Levelentry
All of it: the words, the place, the proof
哪里缺树荫,靠印象说不准。沿固定路线按同一规则记录树冠覆盖与缺口,下一批种树才知道该种在哪。这条工单只做记录。 | Where the shade is missing cannot be settled from impressions. Recording canopy cover and the gaps along a fixed route by the same rule is what tells the next planting where to go. This packet records only. 地点：越秀公园，广州市，广东省。 | Site: Yuexiu Park, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Fund it for $80. Proof lands onchain when it's done.
How this work is done
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Steps
- 沿指定路线按固定间隔拍摄仰视树冠照片。 | Photograph the canopy looking up at fixed intervals along the assigned route.
- 按同一规则估算每个点位的树冠覆盖比例。 | Estimate the canopy cover at each point by the same rule.
- 记录连续无荫路段的长度与所在位置。 | Record the length and location of each continuous unshaded stretch.
- 记录已有树木的明显问题,但不做任何处置。 | Note any obvious problem with existing trees, taking no action on any of them.
- 汇总为一份覆盖记录并按现场公示渠道提交。 | Compile one cover record and submit it through the site's posted channel.
What counts as done
- 固定间隔仰视树冠照片 | Canopy photos at the fixed intervals
- 各点位覆盖比例估值 | Cover estimate at each point
- 连续无荫路段长度记录 | Lengths of the continuous unshaded stretches
- GPS 点与提交回执 | GPS pins plus submission receipt
- Site record: the exact site's name and street address, and the contact who agreed to the work
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
The standard this serves
Urban Canopy. Urban canopy is the layer of leaves over a city, and it is infrastructure as surely as the pipes below the street: shade that cools a block in a heat wave, roots that drink a storm. The i-Tree protocol turns it into something you can count, tree by tree, so a city knows what it has and what it is losing. Mastery looks like a person who can read a whole street's trees at a walk. This packet is a piece of that census: a few trees observed carefully and recorded where the record counts.
What is promised, and what is not
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1787183704496_gqnz1m0","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
Open, but not claimable yet. restricted: china-region-gps. This packet requires GPS location proof from a worker in mainland China, and the cross-border data-transfer safeguards that kind of location data needs are not in place on this protocol yet. It stays readable; voting and pledging are free, and funding is separate from claiming.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.
Other acts: vote, pledge, fund
Packet WORK_1787183704496_gqnz1m0