Talent Park, Nanshan District (public open space, exact site not yet named), Shenzhen, CN
记录公共场地海绵设施的运行状况：南山人才公园 | Record how the site's sponge features are performing: Talent Park, Nanshan District.
海绵设施建成之后,真正决定它是否有用的是运行状况:进水口是否通、洼地是否按时退水、溢流路径是否被改动。这条工单只做记录与上报。 | Once a sponge feature is built, what decides whether it is useful is how it performs: whether the inlet takes Read all of it
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $80 proposed.
Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
- Proof逐处照片 + 运行状况记录表 + 与上次记录对比 + GPS 点 | photo of each feature + the performance record sheet + comparison against the previous reading + GPS pins
- Open until2026-11-18
- Levelentry
All of it: the words, the place, the proof
海绵设施建成之后,真正决定它是否有用的是运行状况:进水口是否通、洼地是否按时退水、溢流路径是否被改动。这条工单只做记录与上报。 | Once a sponge feature is built, what decides whether it is useful is how it performs: whether the inlet takes water, whether the basin draws down on time, and whether the overflow path has been altered. This packet records and reports only. 地点：南山人才公园，深圳市，广东省。 | Site: Talent Park, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Fund it for $80. Proof lands onchain when it's done.
How this work is done
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Steps
- 按场地清单逐处拍摄海绵设施现状。 | Photograph each sponge feature on the site list as found.
- 记录进水口是否畅通、洼地内是否积水以及积水时长。 | Record whether each inlet is open, whether the basin holds water and for how long.
- 记录溢流路径是否被覆盖物、堆放物或改造阻断。 | Record whether the overflow path has been blocked by mulch, stored material or an alteration.
- 按同一表格汇总并与上次记录并列比较。 | Compile it on the same sheet and set it beside the previous reading.
- 按现场公示渠道提交并保留回执。 | Submit through the site's posted channel and keep the receipt.
What counts as done
- 每处设施照片 | Photo of each feature
- 进水与退水情况记录 | Inlet and drawdown record
- 溢流路径阻断情况记录 | Overflow blockage record
- GPS 点与提交回执 | GPS pins plus submission receipt
- Site record: the exact site's name and street address, and the contact who agreed to the work
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1787183795667_i82wne8","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
Open, but not claimable yet. restricted: china-region-gps. This packet requires GPS location proof from a worker in mainland China, and the cross-border data-transfer safeguards that kind of location data needs are not in place on this protocol yet. It stays readable; voting and pledging are free, and funding is separate from claiming.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.
Other acts: vote, pledge, fund
Packet WORK_1787183795667_i82wne8