San Bernardino, CA
Walk a building against the Living Building Challenge petals and write where it stands, San Bernardino, CA.
Most buildings have never been read against any regenerative standard. Read all of it
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $85 proposed.
Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
- Proofthe seven-petal standing sheet + walk photos + the owner review note
- Open until2026-11-19
- Leveladvanced
All of it: the words, the place, the proof
Most buildings have never been read against any regenerative standard. One honest petal-by-petal walk turns a vague sense that a building could be better into a written ladder of real next steps.
Fund it for $85. Proof lands onchain when it's done.
How this work is done
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Steps
- Confirm access and scope with the building's owner or manager; this is their record when it is done.
- Walk the building petal by petal: Place, Water, Energy, Health and Happiness, Materials, Equity, Beauty, noting what the building already does and what it lacks, with photos.
- Read the building's utility and water records where the owner provides them; never estimate what a bill can state.
- Write the standing sheet: for each petal, where the building stands today in plain words, and the single next real step.
- Review the sheet with the owner or manager in person and note their priorities on it.
- Leave the owner the sheet; it is theirs.
What counts as done
- The petal-by-petal standing sheet with a next real step per petal
- Photos from the walk supporting each petal's reading
- The owner or manager review note with their priorities, GPS inside the posting radius
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1787187414677_q6toek7","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
Open, but not claimable yet. The work qualification registry could not be read (registry file not found at /home/ubuntu/ecowealth-production-20260912/data/standards/work-qualification-v0.json), so no packet's requirements can be established. The requirement is a structured fact about this kind of work, not a line of the packet's text, and an attestation does not establish it. It is not claimable yet. It stays readable; voting and pledging are free, and funding is separate from claiming.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.
Other acts: vote, pledge, fund
Packet WORK_1787187414677_q6toek7