← Board

Reserva Natural Provincial Laguna de Rocha, Monte Grande, Partido de Esteban Echeverría, Provincia de Buenos Aires, AR

Plantación del borde de humedal en Reserva Natural Provincial Laguna de Rocha, Partido de Esteban Echeverria (EN: plant the urban wetland margin).

El borde de la laguna sin vegetación se erosiona, se llena de residuos y deja de sostener aves. Read all of it

Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $360 proposed.

Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
  • ProofFotos antes y después, conteo de plantines y GPS. EN: before and after photos, plug count and GPS.
  • Open until2026-11-19
  • Levelintermediate
All of it: the words, the place, the proof

El borde de la laguna sin vegetación se erosiona, se llena de residuos y deja de sostener aves. Una franja plantada con nativas de borde devuelve estructura y hace visible que el lugar está cuidado. EN: a bare lagoon margin erodes, fills with litter and stops holding birds. A planted strip of native margin species gives structure back and makes it visible that the place is tended. Sitio: Reserva Natural Provincial Laguna de Rocha, Monte Grande, Partido de Esteban Echeverría, Provincia de Buenos Aires, AR.

Fund it for $360. Proof lands onchain when it's done.

What it looks like
A planter loosens compacted soil with a hand tool at Reserva Natural Provincial Laguna de Rocha and plants native margin species in a staggered grid along the bare lagoon edge, watering deeply and mulching each one.

A description of this kind of work, not a record that it happened here.

Where
Reserva Natural Provincial Laguna de Rocha, Monte Grande, Partido de Esteban Echeverría, Provincia de Buenos Aires, AR. Open the map
Pay
$360 proposed

This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash: recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.

Proof
Fotos antes y después, conteo de plantines y GPS. EN: before and after photos, plug count and GPS.

This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.

Level
intermediate
Open until
2026-11-19
Posted by
0x034F…6c89

The creator wallet. Its signature is what approves proof and settles the wage.

How this work is done

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.

Steps

  1. Delimitar la franja de borde a plantar y retirar el residuo grueso a mano. (EN: lay out the margin strip and hand remove coarse litter.)
  2. Aflojar el suelo compactado con herramienta de mano hasta 15 centímetros. (EN: loosen compacted soil with a hand tool to 15 centimetres.)
  3. Plantar las especies de borde a la densidad indicada, en tresbolillo. (EN: plant the margin species at the given density in a staggered grid.)
  4. Regar a fondo y cubrir con mantillo. (EN: water deeply and mulch.)
  5. Fotografiar antes y después, contar plantines y registrar GPS. (EN: photograph before and after, count plugs, record GPS.)

What counts as done

  • Foto del borde antes (EN: before photo)
  • Foto del borde plantado (EN: after photo)
  • Conteo de plantines por especie (EN: plug count by species)
  • Punto GPS de la franja (EN: GPS pin)

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.

The standard this serves

Wetland Condition. Wetlands are the landscape's kidneys and nurseries at once: they filter the water, absorb the flood, and raise the young of half the creatures around them. The EPA's rapid assessment gives a trained visitor a way to grade one honestly: the plants present, the water's path, the soil, the wear at the edges. Mastery looks like walking a marsh and knowing, defensibly, how it is doing and what threatens it. This packet is one such visit, one wetland's condition recorded to the method. What is watched can be defended; unwatched wetlands quietly disappear.

What is promised, and what is not

Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1787203172832_3ozkpeb","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.

Open, but not claimable yet. The work qualification registry could not be read (registry file not found at /home/ubuntu/ecowealth-production-20260912/data/standards/work-qualification-v0.json), so no packet's requirements can be established. The requirement is a structured fact about this kind of work, not a line of the packet's text, and an attestation does not establish it. It is not claimable yet. It stays readable; voting and pledging are free, and funding is separate from claiming.

An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.

Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.

Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.

Other acts: vote, pledge, fund

Packet WORK_1787203172832_3ozkpeb