Parque Urquiza, sendero de bajada al rio, Rosario, AR
Rehacer el sendero de bajada del parque con control de erosion | Rebuild the park's descent path with erosion control.
El sendero que baja hacia el rio se convirtio en una canaleta: el agua corre por la traza, se lleva el material Read all of it
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $250 proposed.
Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
- ProofFoto por tramo antes y despues + desagues abiertos + prueba con balde | Photo per stretch before and after plus the cut cross drains plus the bucket check
- Open until2026-11-19
- Levelintermediate
All of it: the words, the place, the proof
El sendero que baja hacia el rio se convirtio en una canaleta: el agua corre por la traza, se lleva el material y deja escalones sueltos que son un riesgo para quien baja. | English: The path down towards the river has turned into a channel: the water runs along the line, carries the material away and leaves loose steps that are a hazard for anyone descending.
Fund it for $250. Proof lands onchain when it's done.
How this work is done
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Steps
- 1. Recorrer la bajada con el area de parques y marcar cada tramo lavado. | Walk the descent with the parks department and mark each washed-out stretch.
- 2. Abrir desagues transversales a mano para sacar el agua de la traza. | Hand cut cross drains to take the water off the line.
- 3. Reponer y compactar el material del sendero en capas, tramo por tramo. | Replace and tamp the path material in layers, stretch by stretch.
- 4. Asegurar los escalones sueltos y verificar el escurrimiento con un balde de agua. | Secure the loose steps and check the runoff with a bucket of water.
What counts as done
- Foto de cada tramo lavado antes del trabajo | Photo of each washed-out stretch before the work
- Foto de los desagues transversales abiertos | Photo of the cut cross drains
- Foto o video de la prueba con balde mostrando el agua saliendo de la traza | Photo or video of the bucket check showing the water leaving the line
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1787206102285_1e0n0h5","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
Open, but not claimable yet. The work qualification registry could not be read (registry file not found at /home/ubuntu/ecowealth-production-20260912/data/standards/work-qualification-v0.json), so no packet's requirements can be established. The requirement is a structured fact about this kind of work, not a line of the packet's text, and an attestation does not establish it. It is not claimable yet. It stays readable; voting and pledging are free, and funding is separate from claiming.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.
Other acts: vote, pledge, fund
Packet WORK_1787206102285_1e0n0h5