Zengcheng greenway, Zengjiang corridor section (public open space, exact site not yet named), Guangzhou, CN
采后修剪公园果树林：增城绿道增江画廊段 | Prune the public park's fruit grove after harvest: Zengcheng greenway, Zengjiang corridor section.
岭南的公共果树林是这一带最老的一种公共食物资产。采果之后不修剪,树冠郁闭、病枝留在树上,第二年的挂果和树本身都会变差。采后一次修剪是这片林子的年度维护。 | A public fruit grove is the oldest kind of public food asset in this region. Read all of it
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $120 proposed.
Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
- Proof同机位前后照片 + 处理株数 + 修剪物去向 + GPS 点 | before and after photos from the same vantage + count pruned + where the arisings went + GPS pin
- Open until2027-08-20
- Levelintermediate
All of it: the words, the place, the proof
岭南的公共果树林是这一带最老的一种公共食物资产。采果之后不修剪,树冠郁闭、病枝留在树上,第二年的挂果和树本身都会变差。采后一次修剪是这片林子的年度维护。 | A public fruit grove is the oldest kind of public food asset in this region. Left unpruned after harvest, the canopy closes over and diseased wood stays in the tree, and both next year's crop and the tree itself get worse. One post-harvest prune is this grove's annual maintenance. 地点：增城绿道增江画廊段，广州市，广东省。 | Site: Zengcheng greenway, Zengjiang corridor section, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Fund it for $120. Proof lands onchain when it's done.
How this work is done
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Steps
- 与管养单位确认可修剪的树与修剪限度,拍摄修剪前树冠。 | Confirm which trees may be pruned and the limits with the site's management contact, and photograph the canopy as found.
- 先剪除枯枝、病枝与交叉枝,伤口平整不留残桩。 | Take out dead, diseased and crossing wood first, cutting clean without leaving stubs.
- 按通风透光原则疏剪内膛枝,单株修剪量不超过约四分之一。 | Thin the interior to open the canopy, taking no more than about a quarter of any one tree.
- 修剪物移至指定堆放点,病枝按场地规定单独处理。 | Move the arisings to the named stockpile, keeping diseased wood separate per the site's rules.
- 按相同机位拍摄完成照片,记录处理株数。 | Photograph from the matching vantage and record the count pruned.
What counts as done
- 修剪前树冠照片 | Before photo of the canopy
- 同机位完成照片 | After photo from the matching vantage
- 处理株数与病枝处理记录 | Count pruned plus the diseased-wood record
- 修剪物去向与 GPS 点 | Where the arisings went plus GPS pin
- Site record: the exact site's name and street address, and the contact who agreed to the work
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1787209537727_gd209va","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
Open, but not claimable yet. restricted: china-region-gps. This packet requires GPS location proof from a worker in mainland China, and the cross-border data-transfer safeguards that kind of location data needs are not in place on this protocol yet. It stays readable; voting and pledging are free, and funding is separate from claiming.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.
Other acts: vote, pledge, fund
Packet WORK_1787209537727_gd209va