← Board

观山湖公园(Guanshanhu Park),观山湖区,贵阳市,贵州省 / Guanshanhu District, Guiyang, Guizhou, CN

养护海绵化改造的生物滞留设施:复位介质层并清通进出水口,观山湖公园(贵阳) / Service the sponge-retrofit bioretention cell: restore the media and clear the inlet and outlet, Guanshanhu Park, Guiyang.

这是一处新城区的大型公园,园内布置了透水铺装与生物滞留设施等海绵化改造。这处海绵化改造的生物滞留设施表层介质被冲走、进出水口被泥沙封住,雨水既进不去也排不出,设施变成一个积水洼地;复位介质层并清通进出水口,是让它按设计持续工作的日常环节。 / A large park in a newer district carrying sponge retrofits, permeable paving and bioretention cells among them. Read all of it

Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $150 proposed.

Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
  • Proof作业前后照片 + 介质补充量与厚度 + 进出水口清通确认 + 积水消退时间记录 / before and after photos + media volume and depth + inlet and outlet clearance confirmation + drawdown-time record
  • Open until2026-11-19
  • Levelintermediate
All of it: the words, the place, the proof

这是一处新城区的大型公园,园内布置了透水铺装与生物滞留设施等海绵化改造。这处海绵化改造的生物滞留设施表层介质被冲走、进出水口被泥沙封住,雨水既进不去也排不出,设施变成一个积水洼地;复位介质层并清通进出水口,是让它按设计持续工作的日常环节。 / A large park in a newer district carrying sponge retrofits, permeable paving and bioretention cells among them. This sponge-retrofit bioretention cell has lost surface media and its inlet and outlet are silted shut, so runoff neither enters nor leaves and the cell has become a standing puddle; restoring the media layer and clearing both ends is the routine that keeps it working as designed.

Fund it for $150. Proof lands onchain when it's done.

Where
观山湖公园(Guanshanhu Park),观山湖区,贵阳市,贵州省 / Guanshanhu District, Guiyang, Guizhou, CN. Open the map
Pay
$150 proposed

This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash: recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.

Proof
作业前后照片 + 介质补充量与厚度 + 进出水口清通确认 + 积水消退时间记录 / before and after photos + media volume and depth + inlet and outlet clearance confirmation + drawdown-time record

This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.

Level
intermediate
Open until
2026-11-19
Posted by
0x034F…6c89

The creator wallet. Its signature is what approves proof and settles the wage.

How this work is done

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.

Steps

  1. 1. 与养护班组取得该设施的设计断面与介质规格,拍摄作业前状态。 Get the cell's designed section and media specification from the maintenance team and photograph it as found.
  2. 2. 清通进水口与溢流出水口的泥沙与杂物,恢复设计标高。 Clear silt and debris from the inlet and the overflow outlet back to their designed levels.
  3. 3. 按规格补充并耙平表层介质,恢复设计蓄水深度,不改动底部结构。 Top up and rake the surface media to specification to restore the designed ponding depth, without touching the underlying structure.
  4. 4. 手工除杂并补植设计名录内植物,浇透一次。 Hand-weed and replant from the designed plant list, then water in once.
  5. 5. 倒水或等一次降雨做下渗观察,记录积水消退时间并拍摄作业后照片。 Pour water or wait for one rain, record how long the ponding takes to drain, and photograph the finished cell.

What counts as done

  • 作业前照片:冲失的介质与封堵的进出水口 / Before photo of the lost media and blocked inlet and outlet
  • 作业后照片:复位的介质层与通畅的进出水口 / After photo of the restored media and open inlet and outlet
  • 介质补充量与表层厚度量测记录 / Log of media volume added and finished surface depth
  • 积水消退时间记录 / Record of how long the ponding took to drain

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.

The standard this serves

Green Stormwater Infrastructure. Green stormwater infrastructure is the city's way of handling rain the way a meadow does: rain gardens, planted swales, and permeable pavement that let a storm soak in instead of surging down a pipe. The EPA's inspection standard keeps these systems honest, because a neglected rain garden quietly stops working while still looking like a garden. Mastery is the inspector's eye: reading inlets, overflow, plants, and soil in a single practiced pass. This packet is one such inspection, one basin checked and one record filed, which is precisely how a thousand basins stay alive.

What is promised, and what is not

Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1787211831211_tucv1gs","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.

Open, but not claimable yet. restricted: china-region-gps. This packet requires GPS location proof from a worker in mainland China, and the cross-border data-transfer safeguards that kind of location data needs are not in place on this protocol yet. It stays readable; voting and pledging are free, and funding is separate from claiming.

An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.

Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.

Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.

Other acts: vote, pledge, fund

Packet WORK_1787211831211_tucv1gs