Anyone can start here · Home / community clinic, private self-report, Milwaukee, WI
AUDIT-C alcohol-use screen + standard-drink audit — Milwaukee.
Fund it for $220. Proof lands onchain when it's done.
$220 proposed
This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash — recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.
Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee.
What the work involvesIn a high-consumption metro, a brief validated alcohol screen (AUDIT-C) plus a standard-drink count is high-value: it converts a normalized habit into a comparable number, conveys that risk rises with intake (GBD 2018), and routes risky or dependent use to a clinician — screen-and-refer, not a diagnosis.
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Bring
- a private, quiet space (confidential self-report)
- the validated AUDIT-C 3-item form
- a standard-drink reference chart (14 g ethanol = 12 oz beer / 5 oz wine / 1.5 oz spirits)
- a calculator or app for weekly standard-drink totals
- a secure note for the result
Steps
- 1. Set a private, non-judgmental setting and confirm this is a self-quantification screen, not a diagnosis; confirm the person is not acutely intoxicated or in crisis right now — if they are, STOP and route to a clinician / emergency.
- 2. Administer AUDIT-C Q1 (how often do you have a drink containing alcohol? scored 0–4), using the standard-drink chart so quantities are comparable.
- 3. Administer Q2 (how many standard drinks on a typical drinking day? 0–4) and Q3 (how often 6+ drinks on one occasion? 0–4); sum the three to the 0–12 AUDIT-C score.
- 4. Compute the weekly standard-drink total and note any heavy-episode pattern; record pregnancy status and any medications or conditions that make any alcohol unsafe.
- 5. Compare against the AUDIT-C positive thresholds (≥4 men / ≥3 women) and convey the GBD 2018 context (risk rises with intake; no level minimizes total health loss) — frame reduction as the lever, never a target that implies a safe amount.
- 6. Record the score, weekly total, pattern, and any red flags; sign. Route positives, dependence signs, or any unsafe context to a clinician, and any crisis to emergency / a crisis line, per the decision rules.
What counts as done
- AUDIT-C 3-item score (0–12) recorded with the standard-drink chart used for comparability (14 g ethanol = 12 oz beer / 5 oz wine / 1.5 oz spirits)
- Weekly standard-drink total and heavy-episode pattern recorded; pregnancy / medication / condition context noted
- AUDIT-C positive threshold applied (≥4 men / ≥3 women) and the GBD 2018 context conveyed without implying a safe level
- Any positive result / dependence sign / unsafe context routed to a clinician (and any crisis routed to emergency or a crisis line), with the referral recorded
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not.
Funding this work is a purchase or a vote, same act: you either want this done here, or you want the world to contain it. A vote is free and signed; funding starts at one cent and anything beyond the wage is recorded as a premium for the worker. Either way the money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1788107032407_rwja45m","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.