Anyone can start here · Home / community clinic, private self-report, Milwaukee, WI

AUDIT-C alcohol-use screen + standard-drink audit — Milwaukee.

Fund it for $220. Proof lands onchain when it's done.

$220 proposed

This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash — recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.

Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee.

What the work involves

In a high-consumption metro, a brief validated alcohol screen (AUDIT-C) plus a standard-drink count is high-value: it converts a normalized habit into a comparable number, conveys that risk rises with intake (GBD 2018), and routes risky or dependent use to a clinician — screen-and-refer, not a diagnosis.

Where
Home / community clinic, private self-report, Milwaukee, WI · Open the map
Pay
$220 proposed

This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash — recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.

Proof
AUDIT-C 3-item score (0–12) with the standard-drink chart applied + weekly standard-drink total + heavy-episode pattern + any positive/dependence/unsafe-context routed to a clinician (or crisis to emergency)

This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.

Level
entry
Open until
2026-12-28
Posted by
0x034F…6c89

The creator wallet. Its signature is what approves proof and settles the wage.

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.

Bring

  • a private, quiet space (confidential self-report)
  • the validated AUDIT-C 3-item form
  • a standard-drink reference chart (14 g ethanol = 12 oz beer / 5 oz wine / 1.5 oz spirits)
  • a calculator or app for weekly standard-drink totals
  • a secure note for the result

Steps

  1. 1. Set a private, non-judgmental setting and confirm this is a self-quantification screen, not a diagnosis; confirm the person is not acutely intoxicated or in crisis right now — if they are, STOP and route to a clinician / emergency.
  2. 2. Administer AUDIT-C Q1 (how often do you have a drink containing alcohol? scored 0–4), using the standard-drink chart so quantities are comparable.
  3. 3. Administer Q2 (how many standard drinks on a typical drinking day? 0–4) and Q3 (how often 6+ drinks on one occasion? 0–4); sum the three to the 0–12 AUDIT-C score.
  4. 4. Compute the weekly standard-drink total and note any heavy-episode pattern; record pregnancy status and any medications or conditions that make any alcohol unsafe.
  5. 5. Compare against the AUDIT-C positive thresholds (≥4 men / ≥3 women) and convey the GBD 2018 context (risk rises with intake; no level minimizes total health loss) — frame reduction as the lever, never a target that implies a safe amount.
  6. 6. Record the score, weekly total, pattern, and any red flags; sign. Route positives, dependence signs, or any unsafe context to a clinician, and any crisis to emergency / a crisis line, per the decision rules.

What counts as done

  • AUDIT-C 3-item score (0–12) recorded with the standard-drink chart used for comparability (14 g ethanol = 12 oz beer / 5 oz wine / 1.5 oz spirits)
  • Weekly standard-drink total and heavy-episode pattern recorded; pregnancy / medication / condition context noted
  • AUDIT-C positive threshold applied (≥4 men / ≥3 women) and the GBD 2018 context conveyed without implying a safe level
  • Any positive result / dependence sign / unsafe context routed to a clinician (and any crisis routed to emergency or a crisis line), with the referral recorded

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.

The money and the proof

What is promised, and what is not.

Funding this work is a purchase or a vote, same act: you either want this done here, or you want the world to contain it. A vote is free and signed; funding starts at one cent and anything beyond the wage is recorded as a premium for the worker. Either way the money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1788107032407_rwja45m","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.

An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.

Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.

Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.