Telehealth / Phoenix, AZ
Time-restricted eating window audit + sustainable earlier-window plan — Phoenix, AZ.
Log a seven-day eating window in Phoenix, AZ and compare the average window and overnight fast to a coached target. Read all of it
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $200 proposed.
Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
- Proof7-day eating-window log with average window + overnight fast recorded + a coached earlier, more consistent window suggested + protein/total intake preserved + a diabetes-medication, pregnancy, eating-disorder or undernutrition flag routed to a clinician
- Open until2026-11-28
- Levelentry
All of it: the words, the place, the proof
Log a seven-day eating window in Phoenix, AZ and compare the average window and overnight fast to a coached target. In Phoenix, where type-2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome are common, a 7-day time-restricted-eating window audit gives a measured eating window and one concrete earlier-window change with protein preserved, explicitly screening diabetes medication, pregnancy, and eating-disorder history to a clinician first, since meal-timing changes can cause dangerous hypoglycemia on glucose-lowering drugs.
Fund it for $200. The receipt lands onchain once the proof is approved.
How this work is done
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
What counts as done
- 7-day eating window logged (time of first and last calorie each day) and the average eating-window and overnight-fast lengths recorded
- Window consistency (day-to-day drift) and how late the last calorie falls relative to bedtime described, as coached context not a prescription
- One concrete, sustainable earlier/more-consistent window change recorded with protein and total intake preserved (not a covert calorie cut)
- Any diabetes on glucose-lowering medication, pregnancy/breastfeeding, eating-disorder history, or undernutrition risk routed to a clinician or registered dietitian, with the referral recorded
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1788107097786_hxgnyle","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.
Other acts: vote, pledge, fund
Packet WORK_1788107097786_hxgnyle