advanced work · Irrigated Central Valley cropland, Visalia, CA
Catch-can distribution-uniformity audit.
Fund it for $360. Proof lands onchain when it's done.
$360 proposed
This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash — recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.
Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee.
What the work involvesAn irrigated field outside Visalia, CA in the Central Valley has never had a catch-can distribution-uniformity test; scheduling is unguided against actual system performance during a multi-year drought basin.
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Bring
- matched catch cans (or cups)
- measuring cylinder / ruler
- pressure gauge
- stopwatch
- GPS phone
- camera
- data sheet
Steps
- 1. Confirm the site/zone; record GPS; identify the system type (sprinkler / drip / micro).
- 2. Sprinkler zones: lay catch cans on a grid across the zone, run the zone a fixed time, and measure the water depth in each can.
- 3. Compute distribution uniformity (low-quarter DU) from the catch-can depths.
- 4. Drip/micro zones: measure emitter flow at several points (fill a container over a fixed time) and inspect for clogs and leaks.
- 5. Read operating pressure at the zone; note leaks, broken/misaligned heads, and overspray onto pavement.
- 6. Review the run schedule against plant/soil need (over/under-watering, runoff).
- 7. Rank fixes (head repair, pressure regulation, schedule change) by water savings; record DU/emitter flow, pressure, leaks, schedule note, photos; sign.
What counts as done
- Photos of catch-can layout + system
- GPS waypoint
- Distribution uniformity (low-quarter DU)
- Operating pressure
- Broken/leaking heads note
- Schedule-vs-need + ranked fixes
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not.
Funding this work is a purchase or a vote, same act: you either want this done here, or you want the world to contain it. A vote is free and signed; funding starts at one cent and anything beyond the wage is recorded as a premium for the worker. Either way the money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1788164435405_mrm7nvd","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.