Document and address the moisture and mold.

A part of a community building in San Antonio, TX shows moisture intrusion and mold risk. This documents the source and scopes the fix so the air stays healthy.

Where

Sa Lanier · San Antonio, TX (community building, exact site not yet named) · Open the map

Pay

$500 proposed

This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash — recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.

Proof

moisture-source photo map + humidity/moisture readings + measured mold-extent inventory + sequenced plan

This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.

Level

intermediate

Open until

2026-09-30

Posted by

0x034F…6c89

The creator wallet. Its signature is what approves proof and settles the wage.

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.

Bring

• camera
• pin/pinless moisture meter
• hygrometer for relative humidity by space
• flashlight (roof space, crawlspace, plant rooms, under sinks, above ceiling tiles)
• tape measure for visible-growth extent against the EPA 10-sq-ft threshold
• N95 respirator and nitrile gloves (surveyor protection; nothing is disturbed)

Steps

1. 1. Start with the building's own record and its people: what the facility manager and staff report (where it smells musty, which spaces generate complaints, when it started), the building's leak and roof history, and any prior remediation. An institutional building usually has a maintenance log, and it is better evidence than a walk alone.
2. 2. Hunt moisture sources space by space and through roof space, crawlspace and plant rooms: active leaks (roof, plumbing, windows, above ceiling tiles), condensation surfaces, grade and drainage at the foundation, HVAC condensate pans and drain lines, humidification systems, and exhaust terminations. Photograph each and take moisture-meter readings at suspect assemblies.
3. 3. Record relative humidity by space against the EPA guidance (below 60%, ideally 30 to 50%) and note where the ventilation or dehumidification arrangement is not achieving it.
4. 4. Document visible growth WITHOUT disturbing it: location, surface material, and measured extent per patch, classed against the EPA threshold. Note that at facility scale the aggregate across a building matters to the remediation plan even where each patch is small.
5. 5. Build the moisture-first sequence: fix the water FIRST with each source mapped to the trade or service contract that owns it, then dry, then remediate, then rebuild. Separate what the building's own maintenance staff can do from what routes to a qualified remediation contractor.
6. 6. Note the occupancy consequences the plan has to carry: which spaces would need to be taken out of use during remediation, whether any affected space serves children or people with respiratory conditions, and what the building's communication duty to its occupants is.
7. 7. Enter photos, GPS/address, the moisture-source map, humidity and moisture readings, the growth inventory and the sequenced plan, and hand it to the facility manager; sign.

What counts as done

• District facilities staff symptom/odor/leak history
• Photo map of every found moisture source with moisture-meter readings
• Room relative-humidity log vs the EPA <60% guidance
• Visible-mold inventory: location, material, measured extent, EPA-threshold class

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.