Run a ground-level module cleaning on Dakota County community solar gardens, Rosemount, MN.

Clean the ground-mount rows at Dakota County community solar gardens from the ground, with the owner's written permission first. Read all of it

Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $140 proposed.

Vote for it

Proof it takes, the deadline, the level

Proofwritten owner permission + before/after photos from one fixed spot + seven days production either side + computed soiling ratio
Open until2026-12-01
Levelintermediate

All of it: the words, the place, the proof

Clean the ground-mount rows at Dakota County community solar gardens from the ground, with the owner's written permission first. The soiling measurement said the glass is costing this array real output. Clean it the way the manufacturers ask: low-mineral or deionized water and a soft brush on a pole, on ground-mount or carport rows only, with subscriber-served gardens under the Xcel Energy Solar*Rewards Community program giving that written permission. prairie-region ground cover scored against the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Habitat Friendly Solar standard. The seven days of production before and after become the receipt, so the community can see what the work was worth instead of taking anyone's word for it.

Fund it for $140. The receipt lands onchain once the proof is approved.

What it looks like: Standing on the ground, a worker cleans a soiled glass module with a soft brush on a pole and low-mineral water, then photographs the same module from the same fixed spot.
A description of this kind of work, not a record that it happened here.
Where: public roads and city parks, Rosemount, Dakota County, MN. Open the map
Pay: $140 proposed
This job is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price, not money held for the worker. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash: recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.
Proof: written owner permission + before/after photos from one fixed spot + seven days production either side + computed soiling ratio
This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.
Level: intermediate
Open until: 2026-12-01
Posted by: 0x034F…6c89
The creator wallet. Its signature is what approves proof and settles the wage.

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.

Bring

camera with a date stamp and a GPS phone
soft-bristle brush on an extension pole rated for glass
deionized or low-mineral water with a hand pump or hose
microfiber cloths and clean buckets
hi-vis vest and gloves
the array's public production record for the seven days either side

Steps

1. Confirm in writing that the array is ground-mount or carport, that the owner permits the cleaning, and that every module in scope is reachable from the ground. If any part needs a ladder or a roof, stop and record why.
2. Photograph the module surfaces before touching anything, from a fixed spot you can return to, and record the date, the time and the days since the last measurable rain from a named weather source.
3. Record the seven days of production before the cleaning from the public dashboard or the owner's meter, with the source named.
4. Clean the glass with low-mineral or deionized water and a soft brush only, working from the ground. Never stand or lean on a module, never walk on a tracker, and never open, touch or switch any enclosure, connector, conduit or switch. No detergent, no solvent, no pressure washer.
5. Photograph the same modules from the same fixed spot after the cleaning, with the date and time.
6. Record the seven days of production after the cleaning, compute the soiling ratio from the two windows at comparable irradiance, and publish both photo sets, both windows and the ratio.

What counts as done

The owner's written permission naming the rows cleaned and the date
Before and after photos of the same modules from the same fixed spot, with GPS and timestamps
Seven days of production before and seven days after, from the dashboard or the owner's meter, with the source named
The soiling ratio computed from those two windows, with the irradiance comparison stated and any damaged module reported to the owner instead of cleaned

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.

What is promised, and what is not

Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1788296967832_bizeqo7","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.

Open, but not claimable yet. restricted: permit-required. Regulated or permit-required work cannot be claimed on this rail yet. It stays readable; voting and pledging are free, and funding is separate from claiming.

An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.

Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.

Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.

Other acts: vote, pledge, fund

Pledge backing, free

Packet WORK_1788296967832_bizeqo7