Anyone can start here · Home / daily-life step data, Boston, MA

Daily activity audit — steps + cadence from a wearable/phone — Boston.

Fund it for $200. Proof lands onchain when it's done.

$200 proposed

This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash — recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.

Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.

What the work involves

Boston, MA is home to Harvard Medical School and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, where Dr. I-Min Lee -- whose research established the dose-response relationship between daily step count and mortality -- has been a professor since 1993, maintaining a parallel affiliation with Brigham and Women's Hospital. A distinct connection from this library's existing Dallas tile, which is built on that city's own car-dependent incidental-walking deficit rather than the underlying science's academic origin, and a distinct reason from this library's existing Boston tile for `circadian_light_anchoring` (Czeisler's light-entrainment research, not step-count epidemiology).

Where
Home / daily-life step data, Boston, MA · Open the map
Pay
$200 proposed

This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash — recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.

Proof
7-day average daily steps + peak sustained cadence (steps/min) vs age-appropriate dose-response context, with a coached volume-then-intensity progression

This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.

Level
entry
Open until
2026-12-31
Posted by
0x034F…6c89

The creator wallet. Its signature is what approves proof and settles the wage.

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.

Bring

  • a validated step counter (wearable or phone pedometer)
  • 7 consecutive days of wear/log
  • the device's cadence or steps/min readout (if available)
  • a note on mobility aids / gait limitations
  • PAR-Q+ or clinician clearance note for new exercisers

Steps

  1. 1. Confirm the device is worn consistently for 7 full days (or logged), and note any mobility aid, injury, or gait limitation affecting the step data. Screen new exercisers with PAR-Q+; route symptoms to a clinician before adding intensity.
  2. 2. Record average daily steps across the 7 days (drop obvious non-wear days and note them).
  3. 3. Record peak sustained cadence (best steps/min over ~30 min) as the intensity marker; >=100 steps/min approximates moderate intensity.
  4. 4. Compare average steps to the age-appropriate dose-response context (benefit rising toward ~7,000-8,000/day in older adults, higher in younger) as a trend/goal, not a prescription or diagnosis.
  5. 5. Set a conservative coached progression: add ~500-1,000 steps/day increments toward the goal, then build cadence with short brisk intervals once volume is stable; respect joint/cardiac limits.
  6. 6. Record the 7-day average, peak cadence, comparison, screen result, and progression plan; sign. Route any red flag to a clinician.

What counts as done

  • 7 consecutive days of step data with any non-wear days noted
  • Average daily steps + peak sustained cadence (steps/min) recorded
  • Comparison to the age-appropriate dose-response context (trend/goal, not a diagnosis)
  • Coached progression recorded (add volume first, then build cadence), with any symptom routed to a clinician

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.

The money and the proof

What is promised, and what is not.

Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1788339618041_m18e9kg","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.

An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.

Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.

Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.