skilled work · On-farm / Onderstepoort, Pretoria, South Africa (sheep and goat operations, warm-season pasture)
FAMACHA anemia scoring round, sheep/goat herd — Onderstepoort, South Africa.
Fund it for $200. Proof lands onchain when it's done.
$200 proposed
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $200 proposed.
- ProofA dated whole-group FAMACHA scoring record using the official card by a trained scorer, with 4-5 scores (and risk-flagged 3s) listed for veterinary-guided treatment and the herd trend kept
- Open until2026-12-01
- Levelskilled
Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.
Not for you? Pledge backing · free Fund this work · $200
What the work involvesFAMACHA was developed and first validated by South African researchers Francois Malan, Gareth Bath, and Jan van Wyk, published 2002 after local testing in South Africa. Onderstepoort, Pretoria is home to the University of Pretoria's Faculty of Veterinary Science -- established 1920, the second-oldest veterinary school in Africa and the only veterinary school in South Africa -- confirmed via WebFetch to Wikipedia. HONESTY LIMIT stated directly: Wikipedia confirmed the institution's real, unique standing as South Africa's only veterinary school, but did not independently confirm Malan, Bath, or van Wyk's personal appointment there, so this connects to the country's own veterinary academic institution in the same country FAMACHA was developed and first validated, not a confirmed personal affiliation. Distinct from the existing Hill Country TX and Sonoma CA tiles, which are built on real US small-ruminant operation density rather than the method's country of origin. Anthelmintic resistance is now documented on most small-ruminant operations worldwide, and every unnecessary blanket treatment makes it worse -- a trained FAMACHA round treats only the animals whose eyelid color says they need it, offered in the country where the card itself was built and first proven.
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Bring
- Official FAMACHA card (obtained with certified training)
- Handling system or helpers to restrain each animal briefly
- Herd log with animal IDs and prior scores
- Natural daylight (scores are unreliable under artificial light)
Steps
- 1. Verify the scorer holds FAMACHA training/certification and the official card; record both. Without them, stop — the round cannot be recorded as FAMACHA.
- 2. Work in natural light. Restrain each animal briefly; cover the eye momentarily, then roll the lower eyelid down with the thumb to expose the conjunctiva.
- 3. Match the conjunctival color to the card's five categories immediately (colors fade from memory); score BOTH eyes and take the worse score.
- 4. Record every animal's score 1-5 with its ID in the dated herd log.
- 5. Check each animal for bottle jaw (submandibular edema), weakness, and body condition while in hand; flag findings.
- 6. List animals scoring 4-5 — and 3s carrying risk factors (bottle jaw, poor condition, lambs/kids, late-pregnancy or heavy-lactation females) — for treatment under the herd's veterinary guidance (VCPR). Drug, dose, and withdrawal are the veterinarian's call.
- 7. Compare the round to prior rounds; a rising share of 3+ scores is a pasture/management flag to raise with the veterinarian, not a prompt to blanket-treat.
What counts as done
- Scorer's FAMACHA certification/training noted and the official card used in natural light
- Every animal's score 1-5 recorded with ID, in a dated herd log kept against prior rounds
- Animals scoring 4-5 (and 3 with risk factors) listed and routed for treatment under a licensed veterinarian's guidance -- drug and dose never chosen from this packet
- Any weak, down, or bottle-jawed animal flagged for urgent veterinary attention
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not.
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1788391823540_rgbajf0","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.