skilled work · St. Joseph, MI: on-farm sow condition scoring rounds
Sow body condition scoring round (caliper method) — St. Joseph, MI.
Fund it for $190. Proof lands onchain when it's done.
$190 proposed
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $190 proposed.
- ProofA dated caliper BCS round (0-5 scale, mm ranges recorded) across the scored sows with gestation/lactation stage context, trend vs the prior round, and any sow outside the target range or showing an emergency sign routed per the decision rules
- Open until2026-12-02
- Levelskilled
Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.
Not for you? Pledge backing · free Fund this work · $190
What the work involvesSt. Joseph, MI is the headquarters of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE) -- founded 1907, ~9,000 members across 100+ countries -- which publishes Applied Engineering in Agriculture, the exact journal this standard's own foundational citation (Knauer MT, Baitinger DJ. 2015;31(2):175-178) appeared in, confirmed via WebFetch to Wikipedia. No honesty-limit caveat needed: ASABE is the direct publisher of the citation's own journal, a stronger tier than the existing Sampson County and Morris tiles, which honestly connect to the study's own validation site and a co-author's institution respectively. Distinct from the existing Sampson County tile (the caliper's original 2015 validation study site), Ames tile (Iowa Pork Industry Center), and Morris tile (Lee Johnston's own University of Minnesota research center) -- St. Joseph is the journal's own publishing society headquarters.
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Bring
- A Sow Body Condition Caliper (or an equivalent validated device with the same 3.8cm-tall, adjustable-width arms)
- A sow-side recording sheet or app with animal ID, parity, and gestation/lactation stage fields
- A stall/pen setup allowing safe access to the sow's loin without entering the stall unsafely
- Prior scoring-round records for trend comparison
Steps
- 1. Approach each sow calmly at the loin (over the last rib, at the widest point of the back) with the caliper arms set to the animal's frame width; avoid startling the sow or working from an unsafe position relative to the stall/pen.
- 2. Place the caliper across the spinous and transverse processes and read the angularity measurement in millimeters.
- 3. Convert the mm reading to the published 0-5 score using the defined bands (0=0-5mm, 1=5-10mm, 2=10-15mm, 3=15-20mm, 4=20-25mm, 5=25-30mm).
- 4. Record the score with the sow's ID, parity, and current gestation/lactation stage (condition targets differ by stage — a sow is expected to lose some condition during lactation, so a single low reading right after farrowing is read differently than the same reading in mid-gestation).
- 5. Compare against the sow's own prior round(s) for a trend, and flag any sow scoring outside the target range (2-3 on the published scale) for a nutritionist/veterinarian ration review.
- 6. While at each stall/pen, observe for lameness, inability to rise, prolapse signs, refusal to eat, or visible cachexia — these route to a veterinarian immediately, ahead of and separate from the routine scoring report.
- 7. Log the full round (all scored sows, dated) and route any flagged animals per the decision rules.
What counts as done
- Caliper scores recorded (0-5 scale with the measured mm value) per sow with ID, parity, and gestation/lactation stage
- Comparison against the prior round's scores recorded as a trend, never a diagnosis
- Sows scoring outside the target range (score 2-3 on the published 0-5 Knauer/Baitinger scale) flagged for a herd veterinarian/nutritionist ration review; the industry-presented 9-16mm caliper-reading range (PIC, ASAS Midwest meeting) is recorded as separate directional context only, never converted into or substituted for the published 0-5 score
- Any sow showing lameness, inability to rise, prolapse signs, refusal to eat, or visible cachexia flagged for immediate veterinary attention, ahead of the routine report
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not.
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1788408035526_qs2qyrf","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.