Telehealth / New Rochelle, NY (compute over an existing lipid panel)
TG/HDL-C ratio — free insulin-resistance signal from an existing lipid panel — New Rochelle, NY.
The worker copies the triglyceride and HDL values from a lipid panel report already on file, divides them on a calculator and records the ratio with the arithmetic. Read all of it
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $80 proposed.
Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
- ProofTG (mg/dL) and HDL-C (mg/dL) from an accredited-lab lipid panel already on file + the computed ratio + the population-appropriate interpretation (or explicit non-applicability) + routing to the insulin_resistance HOMA-IR standard as the reliable alternative
- Open until2027-03-05
- Levelentry
All of it: the words, the place, the proof
Compute the TG to HDL-C ratio in New Rochelle from an existing lipid panel on file. is the direct publisher of the citation's own journal. A lipid panel already on file holds an unread signal of insulin resistance, and reading it the same way for everyone can mislead.
Fund it for $80. The receipt lands onchain once the proof is approved.
Safety, read before you claim
A free derived number, never a diagnosis; NOT interpretable for African-American women, so never used to call a Black woman not insulin resistant. Any elevated or ambiguous result routes to a clinician or HOMA-IR; no medication or supplement follows from the ratio alone.
The full safety list for this job:
- This packet is independent of and not affiliated with Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.: named as the real, verified publisher of this standard's own citation, not an endorsement or partnership.
How this work is done
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
What counts as done
- TG and HDL-C values (mg/dL) transcribed from an existing accredited-lab lipid panel report, dated
- TG/HDL-C ratio computed and shown with the arithmetic
- Interpretation banded per the population-appropriate evidence: general/white-cohort threshold >=3.0 (McLaughlin 2003); African-American women — ratio explicitly NOT interpretable, stated as such, never used to reassure; African-American men — threshold 2.5, not 2.0 (Sumner 2010)
- The insulin_resistance (fasting insulin + HOMA-IR) standard named as the reliable, population-neutral alternative when this ratio's population limit applies or the result is ambiguous
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1788681734050_fa2nsy9","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.
Other acts: vote, pledge, fund
Packet WORK_1788681734050_fa2nsy9