FAMACHA anemia scoring round, sheep/goat herd — Langston, OK.

Langston, OK is home to the E (Kika) de la Garza American Institute for Goat Research at Langston University, formed 1984, confirmed via WebFetch to its own official website (goats.langston.edu, since this session's earlier research found no dedicated Wikipedia page for it): a real institute conducting FEC/FAMACHA field research on commercial goat and sheep farms -- squarely this standard's own species and method. No honesty-limit caveat needed: the institute's own published field program covers exactly the FAMACHA/parasite-monitoring work this standard administers, a direct field-research connection rather than a broad-field guess. A genuinely separate reuse of Langston from this session's `fecal_egg_count_monitoring` tile, since that standard's own citation (Gordon & Whitlock 1939 McMaster technique) is distinct from this standard's own FAMACHA citations (van Wyk & Bath 2002; Kaplan 2004). Distinct from the existing Hill Country TX, national, Onderstepoort (the method's country of origin), Athens (Kaplan's likely field), Sonoma, and Amsterdam (Elsevier, the Kaplan 2004 citation's own journal publisher) tiles -- Langston is a dedicated goat-research institute conducting field FAMACHA work, a distinct category from every existing tile.

Where

On-farm / Langston, OK (sheep and goat operations, warm-season pasture) · Open the map

Pay

$200 proposed

This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash: recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.

Proof

A dated whole-group FAMACHA scoring record using the official card by a trained scorer, with 4-5 scores (and risk-flagged 3s) listed for veterinary-guided treatment and the herd trend kept

This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.

Level

skilled

Open until

2026-12-05

Posted by

0x034F…6c89

The creator wallet. Its signature is what approves proof and settles the wage.

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.

Bring

• Official FAMACHA card (obtained with certified training)
• Handling system or helpers to restrain each animal briefly
• Herd log with animal IDs and prior scores
• Natural daylight (scores are unreliable under artificial light)

Steps

1. 1. Verify the scorer holds FAMACHA training/certification and the official card; record both. Without them, stop — the round cannot be recorded as FAMACHA.
2. 2. Work in natural light. Restrain each animal briefly; cover the eye momentarily, then roll the lower eyelid down with the thumb to expose the conjunctiva.
3. 3. Match the conjunctival color to the card's five categories immediately (colors fade from memory); score BOTH eyes and take the worse score.
4. 4. Record every animal's score 1-5 with its ID in the dated herd log.
5. 5. Check each animal for bottle jaw (submandibular edema), weakness, and body condition while in hand; flag findings.
6. 6. List animals scoring 4-5 — and 3s carrying risk factors (bottle jaw, poor condition, lambs/kids, late-pregnancy or heavy-lactation females) — for treatment under the herd's veterinary guidance (VCPR). Drug, dose, and withdrawal are the veterinarian's call.
7. 7. Compare the round to prior rounds; a rising share of 3+ scores is a pasture/management flag to raise with the veterinarian, not a prompt to blanket-treat.

What counts as done

• Scorer's FAMACHA certification/training noted and the official card used in natural light
• Every animal's score 1-5 recorded with ID, in a dated herd log kept against prior rounds
• Animals scoring 4-5 (and 3 with risk factors) listed and routed for treatment under a licensed veterinarian's guidance -- drug and dose never chosen from this packet
• Any weak, down, or bottle-jawed animal flagged for urgent veterinary attention

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.