AUDIT-C alcohol-use screen + standard-drink audit — Chicago.

This standard's own foundational citation, Bush et al. 1998, was published in Archives of Internal Medicine -- renamed JAMA Internal Medicine in 2013, and both titles are published by the American Medical Association (AMA), headquartered in Chicago, IL, confirmed via WebFetch to Wikipedia. A distinct connection from this library's existing Milwaukee tile (that city's own high-consumption metro context) and Seattle tile (IHME/University of Washington, the GBD study's coordinating institution, a separate citation entirely) -- Chicago is the AUDIT-C citation's own confirmed journal publisher.

Where

Home / community clinic, private self-report, Chicago, IL · Open the map

Pay

$220 proposed

This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash: recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.

Proof

AUDIT-C 3-item score (0–12) with the standard-drink chart applied + weekly standard-drink total + heavy-episode pattern + any positive/dependence/unsafe-context routed to a clinician (or crisis to emergency)

This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.

Level

entry

Open until

2027-01-06

Posted by

0x034F…6c89

The creator wallet. Its signature is what approves proof and settles the wage.

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.

Bring

• a private, quiet space (confidential self-report)
• the validated AUDIT-C 3-item form
• a standard-drink reference chart (14 g ethanol = 12 oz beer / 5 oz wine / 1.5 oz spirits)
• a calculator or app for weekly standard-drink totals
• a secure note for the result

Steps

1. 1. Set a private, non-judgmental setting and confirm this is a self-quantification screen, not a diagnosis; confirm the person is not acutely intoxicated or in crisis right now — if they are, STOP and route to a clinician / emergency.
2. 2. Administer AUDIT-C Q1 (how often do you have a drink containing alcohol? scored 0–4), using the standard-drink chart so quantities are comparable.
3. 3. Administer Q2 (how many standard drinks on a typical drinking day? 0–4) and Q3 (how often 6+ drinks on one occasion? 0–4); sum the three to the 0–12 AUDIT-C score.
4. 4. Compute the weekly standard-drink total and note any heavy-episode pattern; record pregnancy status and any medications or conditions that make any alcohol unsafe.
5. 5. Compare against the AUDIT-C positive thresholds (≥4 men / ≥3 women) and convey the GBD 2018 context (risk rises with intake; no level minimizes total health loss) — frame reduction as the lever, never a target that implies a safe amount.
6. 6. Record the score, weekly total, pattern, and any red flags; sign. Route positives, dependence signs, or any unsafe context to a clinician, and any crisis to emergency / a crisis line, per the decision rules.

What counts as done

• AUDIT-C 3-item score (0–12) recorded with the standard-drink chart used for comparability (14 g ethanol = 12 oz beer / 5 oz wine / 1.5 oz spirits)
• Weekly standard-drink total and heavy-episode pattern recorded; pregnancy / medication / condition context noted
• AUDIT-C positive threshold applied (≥4 men / ≥3 women) and the GBD 2018 context conveyed without implying a safe level
• Any positive result / dependence sign / unsafe context routed to a clinician (and any crisis routed to emergency or a crisis line), with the referral recorded

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.