Broiler/backyard meat-bird gait score (Bristol scale) — Horsham, England.

Confirmed via WebFetch to Wikipedia that the RSPCA, headquartered Horsham, West Sussex, England, publishes its own 'RSPCA Welfare standards for meat chickens' and runs RSPCA Assured, a farm animal welfare assurance scheme with 'stringent higher welfare standards' -- squarely including the broiler-lameness question this standard's own Bristol scale measures. HONESTY LIMIT stated directly: the RSPCA's real, verified role as a UK farm-animal welfare charity publishing its own meat-chicken standards is confirmed, but this session could not independently confirm via the pages fetched that those standards specifically adopt the Bristol/Kestin gait score, so this connects to a real, verified UK farm-welfare organization publishing standards in this standard's own exact subject, not a confirmed direct adoption. Distinct from the existing national, Gainesville (US broiler industry's own vertical-integration origin city), Bristol (the scale's own namesake city and university), London (BVA, the commissioning professional society), Washington DC (NCC, a national trade association), Schaumburg (AVMA, a national veterinary professional body), and Hoboken (Wiley, the citations' own contracted journal publisher) tiles -- Horsham is a UK farm-animal welfare charity that publishes its own meat-chicken welfare standards, an eighth distinct category.

Where

On-site with the flock / Horsham, England (broiler and backyard meat-bird flocks) · Open the map

Pay

$140 proposed

This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash: recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.

Proof

A dated flock gait-score round: sample size/method, per-bird Bristol 0-5 score, contact-dermatitis welfare signs noted, flock distribution and share scoring ≥3 recorded and compared to the prior round, with every ≥4 or pain-signal bird routed

This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.

Level

entry

Open until

2026-12-07

Posted by

0x034F…6c89

The creator wallet. Its signature is what approves proof and settles the wage.

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.

Bring

• A flat, unobstructed walking area (about 2 m) inside or beside the coop/run
• The published Bristol 0-5 gait-score descriptions/photos
• A sampling plan and tally sheet
• Prior audit scores for trend

Steps

1. 1. State the sample: whole flock for small backyard keeps, or a representative sample for larger meat-bird flocks; record the number scored.
2. 2. Encourage each sampled bird to walk about 2 m across a flat, unobstructed area without chasing or startling it; observe from the side.
3. 3. Assign the Bristol 0-5 gait score per bird from the published descriptions: 0 (normal, agile) through 5 (unable to walk/stand); do not average — record each bird's own score.
4. 4. Note visible contributors while scoring: hock burn, breast blisters, or footpad dermatitis (contact-dermatitis welfare signs that often travel with poor gait).
5. 5. Record the flock distribution (count per score 0-5) and the share scoring 3 or above.
6. 6. Compare to the prior audit; a rising share of 3+ scores is a management/genetics flag, not something to wait out.
7. 7. Route findings: any individual bird scoring 4-5, or showing pain signs (reluctance to move to feed/water, isolating), separated and routed per the decision rules; flock-level rising lameness routes to a management/genetics review.

What counts as done

• Sample size and sampling method stated; every sampled bird scored individually 0-5 on the Bristol scale
• Contact-dermatitis welfare signs (hock burn, breast blister, footpad dermatitis) recorded alongside gait score
• Flock-level score distribution and the share scoring 3 or above recorded, compared against the prior round when one exists
• Any bird scoring 4-5, or showing pain/isolation behavior, routed to a veterinarian or humane on-farm euthanasia per the decision rules

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.