Plant-food diversity audit — distinct plants per week — La Jolla, CA.

No honesty-limit caveat needed: confirmed directly from PubMed's own record (via NCBI eutils, PMID 29795809) that Daniel McDonald, first author of this Read all of it

Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $220 proposed.

Claim this job

Proof it takes, the deadline, the level

Proof7-day count of DISTINCT plant species (counting species, not servings) vs the ~30/week context, plus identified group gaps and a coached diversity progression
Open until2027-01-07
Levelentry

All of it: the words, the place, the proof

No honesty-limit caveat needed: confirmed directly from PubMed's own record (via NCBI eutils, PMID 29795809) that Daniel McDonald, first author of this standard's own foundational citation ('American Gut: an Open Platform for Citizen Science Microbiome Research,' mSystems 2018, the American Gut Project this standard's ~30-plants/week target is drawn from), is affiliated with the Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA — a direct, named-author-institution match sourced from the paper's own PubMed record. Distinct from the existing national (generic telehealth framing), Detroit (that city's own real fresh-food-access context), and Washington DC (ASM, the citation's own journal publisher) tiles — La Jolla is this standard's own foundational citation's first author's institution, a fourth distinct category.

Fund it for $220. Proof lands onchain when it's done.

Where: Home / daily-life food log, La Jolla, CA. Open the map
Pay: $220 proposed
This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash: recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.
Proof: 7-day count of DISTINCT plant species (counting species, not servings) vs the ~30/week context, plus identified group gaps and a coached diversity progression
This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.
Level: entry: anyone can start here
Open until: 2027-01-07
Posted by: 0x034F…6c89
The creator wallet. Its signature is what approves proof and settles the wage.

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.

Bring

a 7-day food log or meal photos
a plant-tally sheet (species, not servings)
note on food allergies/intolerances + any GI condition
note on any clinician-directed restrictive diet

Steps

1. Log 7 days of food; note any diagnosed GI condition (IBD, celiac), food allergies/intolerances, or a clinician-directed restrictive diet — these change the plan and may need a dietitian.
2. Tally DISTINCT plant species across the week — count each vegetable, fruit, legume, nut/seed, whole grain, and herb/spice once (not per serving); different varieties/colors count separately.
3. Compare the weekly distinct-plant count to the ~30/week diversity context (McDonald 2018) as a coached goal, not a prescription.
4. Identify low-coverage groups (e.g., no legumes, few whole grains) and set a coached progression: add 2-3 new plants/week from the missing groups, favor fiber + polyphenol-rich choices, and increase fiber gradually with fluids.
5. Record the distinct-plant count, group gaps, and the coached plan; sign. Route any red flag to a clinician / dietitian.

What counts as done

7-day distinct-plant-species count (each vegetable/fruit/legume/nut-seed/whole-grain/herb-spice counted once)
Low-coverage plant groups identified (legumes / whole grains / nuts-seeds / herbs-spices / produce color range)
Coached progression recorded (add new plants from missing groups; increase fiber gradually with fluids)
Allergy / GI-condition / restrictive-diet context recorded and any red flag routed to a clinician / dietitian

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.

What is promised, and what is not

Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1788978633786_belbym8","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.

Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.

An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.

Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.

Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.

Other acts: vote, pledge, fund

Vote for it, free Pledge backing, free Fund this work, $220

Packet WORK_1788978633786_belbym8