Weekly nature-contact dose audit — Exeter, England.

No honesty-limit caveat needed: confirmed directly from PubMed's own record (via NCBI eutils, PMID 31197192) that Mathew P. Read all of it

Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $180 proposed.

Claim this job

Proof it takes, the deadline, the level

Proof7-day nature-contact log (minutes + location type) totaled vs 120 min/week target + coached plan using a named local green space + any mood/safety concern routed to a clinician or crisis line
Open until2026-11-08
Levelentry

All of it: the words, the place, the proof

No honesty-limit caveat needed: confirmed directly from PubMed's own record (via NCBI eutils, PMID 31197192) that Mathew P. White, first author of this standard's own foundational citation ('Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing,' Sci Rep. 2019 -- the exact 120 min/week threshold this standard's proof rule uses), is affiliated with the European Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK -- a direct, named-author-institution match sourced from the paper's own PubMed record. Distinct from the existing national (generic telehealth framing), Portland (that city's own Forest Park/urban-canopy density), and Washington DC (AAAS, the other citation's own journal publisher) tiles — Exeter is this standard's own foundational 120-minute-threshold citation's first author's institution, a fourth distinct category.

Fund it for $180. Proof lands onchain when it's done.

Where: Local green space, Exeter, England (any accessible green space). Open the map
Pay: $180 proposed
This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash: recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.
Proof: 7-day nature-contact log (minutes + location type) totaled vs 120 min/week target + coached plan using a named local green space + any mood/safety concern routed to a clinician or crisis line
This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.
Level: entry: anyone can start here
Open until: 2026-11-08
Posted by: 0x034F…6c89
The creator wallet. Its signature is what approves proof and settles the wage.

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.

Bring

a 7-day nature-contact log (paper, phone notes, or app)
a timer or phone clock to record minutes outdoors in nature
a list of accessible local green spaces (parks, trails, forests, gardens, waterfronts) within commuting distance
note on any mobility, heat-sensitivity, or allergy limitation

Steps

1. Ask up front about persistent low mood, anxiety, or any thoughts of self-harm; if suicidal ideation or self-harm risk is present -> STOP and route to a crisis line / emergency immediately (e.g., 988 in the US).
2. Record any mobility limitation, heat/cold sensitivity, severe allergy (e.g., insect sting anaphylaxis), or safety concern that changes what 'nature contact' can look like for this person; accommodate in the plan, never override.
3. Log 7 days of nature contact: for each day, record the minutes spent in a natural environment (park, trail, forest, garden, waterfront, green corridor) AND the location type; commuting through green space counts only if walking/cycling, not driving.
4. Total the weekly minutes and compare to the 120 min/week threshold (White 2019) as a coached context, not a prescription; note whether contact is concentrated in one long session or spread across multiple shorter ones (both patterns show benefit).
5. Identify a named, accessible local green space the person can realistically reach (within a walk, bike, or short transit ride); the coached plan should point at a REAL place, not a generic suggestion.
6. Record the weekly total, the location type breakdown, the named local green space, and the coached plan; sign. Route any mood disturbance or safety concern to a clinician or crisis line.

What counts as done

7-day nature-contact log with daily minutes and location type (park, trail, forest, garden, waterfront) recorded
Weekly total compared to the 120 min/week threshold (White 2019) as a coached target, not a prescription
A coached plan to reach or maintain the dose using a named local green space
Any mood disturbance, suicidal ideation, or safety concern routed to a clinician or crisis line, with referral recorded

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.

What is promised, and what is not

Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1788978653596_nsu84wn","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.

Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.

An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.

Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.

Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.

Other acts: vote, pledge, fund

Vote for it, free Pledge backing, free Fund this work, $180

Packet WORK_1788978653596_nsu84wn