← Board

Sacramento, CA (community building, exact site not yet named)

Document and address the moisture and mold.

A part of a community building in Sacramento, CA shows moisture intrusion and mold risk. Read all of it

Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $280 proposed.

Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
  • Proofphoto log of every moisture/mold sign found, each labeled with its room + likely source
  • Open until2026-10-29
  • Levelentry
All of it: the words, the place, the proof

A part of a community building in Sacramento, CA shows moisture intrusion and mold risk. This documents the source and scopes the fix so the air stays healthy.

Fund it for $280. Proof lands onchain when it's done.

Where
Sacramento, CA (community building, exact site not yet named). Open the map
Pay
$280 proposed

This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash: recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.

Proof
photo log of every moisture/mold sign found, each labeled with its room + likely source

This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.

Level
entry: anyone can start here
Open until
2026-10-29
Posted by
0x034F…6c89

The creator wallet. Its signature is what approves proof and settles the wage.

How this work is done

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.

Bring

  • camera
  • pin/pinless moisture meter
  • hygrometer for relative humidity by space
  • flashlight (roof space, crawlspace, plant rooms, under sinks, above ceiling tiles)
  • tape measure for visible-growth extent against the EPA 10-sq-ft threshold
  • N95 respirator and nitrile gloves (surveyor protection; nothing is disturbed)

Steps

  1. 1. Start with the building's own record and its people: what the facility manager and staff report (where it smells musty, which spaces generate complaints, when it started), the building's leak and roof history, and any prior remediation. An institutional building usually has a maintenance log, and it is better evidence than a walk alone.
  2. 2. Hunt moisture sources space by space and through roof space, crawlspace and plant rooms: active leaks (roof, plumbing, windows, above ceiling tiles), condensation surfaces, grade and drainage at the foundation, HVAC condensate pans and drain lines, humidification systems, and exhaust terminations. Photograph each and take moisture-meter readings at suspect assemblies.
  3. 3. Record relative humidity by space against the EPA guidance (below 60%, ideally 30 to 50%) and note where the ventilation or dehumidification arrangement is not achieving it.
  4. 4. Document visible growth WITHOUT disturbing it: location, surface material, and measured extent per patch, classed against the EPA threshold. Note that at facility scale the aggregate across a building matters to the remediation plan even where each patch is small.
  5. 5. Build the moisture-first sequence: fix the water FIRST with each source mapped to the trade or service contract that owns it, then dry, then remediate, then rebuild. Separate what the building's own maintenance staff can do from what routes to a qualified remediation contractor.
  6. 6. Note the occupancy consequences the plan has to carry: which spaces would need to be taken out of use during remediation, whether any affected space serves children or people with respiratory conditions, and what the building's communication duty to its occupants is.
  7. 7. Enter photos, GPS/address, the moisture-source map, humidity and moisture readings, the growth inventory and the sequenced plan, and hand it to the facility manager; sign.

What counts as done

  • Photo of each stain, peeling-paint area, or musty-smell source found
  • Room-by-room checklist noting which rooms were clear and which had a finding
  • Facilities-staff sign-off that the walk covered every flagged room

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.

What is promised, and what is not

Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1789357001055_e6d7ct0","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.

Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.

An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.

Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.

Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.

Other acts: vote, pledge, fund

Packet WORK_1789357001055_e6d7ct0