Wenhua Park, Chancheng District (public open space, exact site not yet named), Foshan, CN
清除公共设施上的涂污：禅城文华公园 | Remove the graffiti from the public fittings: Wenhua Park, Chancheng District.
公共设施上的涂污留得越久越难清,也让这片空间看起来没人管。用最小侵入的方法尽快清掉,同时不损伤基材,是最有效的做法。 | Graffiti on public fittings gets harder to remove the longer it stays, and it makes the space read as unlooked-after. Read all of it
Not payable in cash on this rail. Settles as earned credit, $80 proposed.
Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
- Proof同机位前后照片 + 基材试验记录 + 所用方法与面积 + 废水去向记录 | before and after photos from the same vantage + the substrate test record + method and area + the wash-water record
- Open until2026-10-18
- Levelentry
All of it: the words, the place, the proof
公共设施上的涂污留得越久越难清,也让这片空间看起来没人管。用最小侵入的方法尽快清掉,同时不损伤基材,是最有效的做法。 | Graffiti on public fittings gets harder to remove the longer it stays, and it makes the space read as unlooked-after. Removing it promptly by the least invasive method that does not damage the substrate is what works. 地点：禅城文华公园，佛山市，广东省。 | Site: Wenhua Park, Chancheng District, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Fund it for $80. Proof lands onchain when it's done.
How this work is done
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Steps
- 与管养单位确认可处理的设施与允许使用的方法。 | Confirm which fittings may be treated and which methods are allowed with the site's management contact.
- 拍摄现状,在不显眼处做基材小面积试验。 | Photograph as found and run a small test patch on the substrate somewhere inconspicuous.
- 按试验结果由最温和的方法开始处理,逐步加强。 | Start with the gentlest method the test allows and step up only as needed.
- 控制废水不直接流入雨水口,按场地规定处理。 | Keep the wash water out of the storm inlet and handle it per the site's rules.
- 按相同机位拍摄完成照片,记录所用方法与面积。 | Photograph from the matching vantage and record the method used and the area treated.
What counts as done
- 涂污处作业前照片 | Before photo of the graffiti
- 同机位完成照片 | After photo from the matching vantage
- 基材试验记录与所用方法 | Substrate test record plus the method used
- 处理面积与废水去向记录 | Area treated plus the wash-water record
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1789706383571_kkd79w1","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
Open, but not claimable yet. restricted: china-region-gps. This packet requires GPS location proof from a worker in mainland China, and the cross-border data-transfer safeguards that kind of location data needs are not in place on this protocol yet. It stays readable; voting and pledging are free, and funding is separate from claiming.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.
Other acts: vote, pledge, fund
Packet WORK_1789706383571_kkd79w1