Telehealth coaching / accredited lab only if clinically indicated, San Francisco, CA
Vitamin D empiric-supplementation eligibility + RDA coaching — San Francisco (Endocrine Society 2024 four groups).
Screen vitamin D supplementation eligibility in San Francisco using the Endocrine Society's 2024 four-group empiric criteria. Read all of it
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $120 proposed.
Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
- ProofEligibility checked for the four empiric groups + Dose plan matched to the eligible group + RDA-level coaching given if no group applies + 25-OH-D draw arranged only with a clinician-identified indication
- Open until2026-11-23
- Levelintermediate
All of it: the words, the place, the proof
Screen vitamin D supplementation eligibility in San Francisco using the Endocrine Society's 2024 four-group empiric criteria. The 2024 guideline (Demay et al. 2024, JCEM 109(8):1907-1947) reversed the older habit of testing 25-OH-D and chasing a 30-50 ng/mL 'sufficiency' number: it no longer endorses any specific sufficiency threshold and suggests AGAINST routine testing in healthy adults. This packet coaches a person through the current logic: check the four empiric-supplementation-eligible groups, coach RDA-level intake if none apply, and reserve an actual blood draw for a clinician-identified indication only.
Fund it for $120. Proof lands onchain when it's done.
How this work is done
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Bring
- age, pregnancy status, and prediabetes/diabetes-risk status on file
- current vitamin D intake (diet + supplement) and any prescribed medications affecting calcium/vitamin D metabolism
- accredited-lab requisition or validated dried-blood-spot 25-OH-D kit -- used ONLY if a clinical indication is confirmed
Steps
- 1. Check eligibility for each of the four Endocrine Society 2024 empiric-supplementation groups in turn: age <=18; age >=75; currently pregnant; high-risk prediabetes on lifestyle modification.
- 2. If eligible for one or more groups, record a dose plan within that group's cited trial range (children/teens ~1200 IU/day weighted average, trials 300-2000 IU; adults 75+ ~900 IU/day, trials 400-3333 IU, daily low-dose preferred over intermittent high-dose; pregnant ~2500 IU/day, trials 600-5000 IU; high-risk prediabetes ~3500 IU/day, trials 842-7543 IU) -- framed as empiric, no test required.
- 3. If not eligible for any group, coach RDA-level intake instead: 600 IU/day (IOM) for adults under 70, 800 IU/day for adults 70+, and stop there -- no test, no higher empiric dose.
- 4. Ask whether the person's own clinician has identified an actual clinical indication for testing (e.g. hypocalcemia, malabsorption, or a condition/medication affecting vitamin D metabolism). If yes, arrange the 25-OH-D draw and route interpretation to that clinician -- this method does not interpret the result or set a repletion dose. If no, do not order a test.
- 5. Record current supplement/medication use and flag any interaction (see decision rules) before finalizing the plan.
- 6. Log the eligibility screen, the dose plan or RDA coaching given, and whether a test was arranged and why; sign it.
What counts as done
- Eligibility for each of the four empiric-supplementation groups explicitly checked and recorded (age <=18, age >=75, pregnant, high-risk prediabetes on lifestyle modification)
- If eligible: a dose plan recorded within the guideline's cited trial dose range for that group, framed as empiric (no test required), never a fixed universal number
- If not eligible: RDA-level intake coaching recorded (600 IU under 70, 800 IU 70+), with no test ordered by default
- Any 25-OH-D blood draw arranged only after confirming and recording an actual clinician-identified clinical indication (e.g. hypocalcemia), never as a routine default
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1790263821969_lj260f1","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.
Other acts: vote, pledge, fund
Packet WORK_1790263821969_lj260f1