On-site with the property / national (any yard, garden, or landscaped property with a lawn and outdoor lighting)
Household insect-decline pressure audit (outdoor lighting + lawn mowing frequency) — site / national.
A homeowner walks the yard at dusk with a phone flashlight app measuring color temperature at each outdoor fixture, then paces off the lawn's current mowing interval on a garden calendar. Read all of it
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $105 proposed.
Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
- ProofEvery outdoor light fixture inventoried by type and color temperature + Any white LED lighting flagged as the strongest measured pressure + Lawn mowing schedule recorded against the biweekly interval + No-Mow-May-style claim never repeated as evidence + Uncertain pesticide or invasive-species finding routed to extension
- Open until2027-02-21
- Levelentry
All of it: the words, the place, the proof
Audit your property's outdoor lighting and lawn mowing frequency against two real insect-decline pressure studies. Most household pollinator advice stops at planting flowers, but two ordinary, site-controllable choices -- what kind of outdoor light stays on at night, and how often the lawn gets mowed -- carry their own measured, sometimes counterintuitive effects on local insect abundance that a flower bed alone never offsets.
Offer to pay $105. The receipt lands onchain once the proof is approved.
Safety, read before you claim
No special training is needed. Household-pressure observation and coaching audit only, never a pesticide, lighting-code, or landscaping design service, and never claim that eliminating a pressure guarantees more insects on this property; state only the cited studies' own measured directions.
The full safety list for this job:
- The Boyes 2021 study measured moth caterpillars specifically; its findings are reported as evidence for nocturnal insects broadly, not proof of an identical effect size for every insect group.
- The Lerman 2018 study was conducted in one New England city over two growing seasons with 16 yards; its own authors note results may not generalize to every ecoregion, stated here as the same honesty limit.
- The retracted Del Toro & Ribbons 2020 'No Mow May' study is named ONLY as an example of a claim this standard does not rely on, never repeated as if it were still valid evidence.
- No pesticide, herbicide, or chemical recommendation of any kind is made from this packet; any such question routes to the local cooperative extension office.
How this work is done
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Bring
- A phone flashlight/color-temperature app or a simple warm/cool visual check for each outdoor fixture
- A tape measure or pace count for lawn area, and a mowing log or calendar
- A notebook or form to log fixture type, color temperature, and mowing interval
- Contact information for the local cooperative extension office on file BEFORE the audit
Steps
- 1. Walk the property after dusk (or check fixture specifications in daylight) and inventory every outdoor light: type (LED, HPS/LPS sodium, incandescent, other), approximate color temperature (warm ~2700-3000K vs cool/white ~4000K+), and whether it runs dusk-to-dawn or is motion/timer-controlled.
- 2. Flag any dusk-to-dawn white LED fixture as the strongest measured pressure per Boyes et al. 2021 (white LED produced greater caterpillar-abundance reductions than sodium lighting in both hedgerow and grass-margin habitat).
- 3. Coach a specific fix for each flagged fixture: add a motion sensor or timer, add shielding to direct light downward and away from vegetation, or switch to a warmer color-temperature bulb -- record which fix the household chooses, if any.
- 4. Record the current lawn mowing interval in days from the household's own recent history or mower log.
- 5. Compare the recorded interval explicitly to Lerman et al. 2018's biweekly (12-14 day) finding, stating both halves of the tradeoff: biweekly mowing produced the highest bee abundance (>30% more, p=0.002) but the lowest bee richness and evenness (p<0.0001) of the three tested intervals.
- 6. If the household asks about not mowing at all (e.g. 'No Mow May'), state plainly that the widely-cited Del Toro & Ribbons 2020 study behind that claim was retracted in November 2022 for data-handling and reporting problems, and never cite it as evidence.
- 7. Record any pesticide, herbicide, or invasive-species question raised during the audit and route it to the local cooperative extension office rather than answering it from this packet.
- 8. Log the full inventory (lighting fixtures + fixes coached, mowing interval + tradeoff stated, any routed questions) in a dated record for the household to revisit next season.
What counts as done
- Every outdoor light fixture on the property inventoried: type (LED, high/low-pressure sodium, incandescent, other), approximate color temperature or warm/cool rating, and whether it runs dusk-to-dawn or on a motion sensor/timer
- Any dusk-to-dawn white LED fixture flagged explicitly as the strongest measured pressure per the cited study, with a coached fix recorded (motion sensor or timer, shielding to point light downward, or a warmer color-temperature bulb) -- never a claim that any lighting is insect-neutral
- Current lawn mowing interval recorded in days, compared explicitly to the cited biweekly (12-14 day) finding, with the honest tradeoff (higher bee abundance, lower richness/evenness at that interval) stated rather than presented as a simple 'more bees is better' verdict
- The retracted 'No Mow May' claim never cited as evidence for reduced mowing in this record, even if the household asks about it directly
- Any pesticide/herbicide use question or a suspected invasive plant/insect finding routed to the local cooperative extension office rather than answered from this packet
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment, made by the payer straight to the worker, with no Vealth fee. Paying Vealth is closed: Vealth takes no new card or wallet payment for a job. To fund a job, offer to pay the worker directly, then pay them yourself when you accept the proof, from your own wallet or by your own card or bank. From a wallet: prepare_token_offer, sign, submit_token_offer; after the proof is accepted you pay the worker on chain and the worker records it (prepare_token_settlement, or POST /labor/settle for USDC on Base). By card or bank: prepare_direct_offer, sign, submit_direct_offer; you pay the worker yourself and the worker records it with prepare_direct_settlement. Both are free, need no gas, and move no money through Vealth.
Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.
Other acts: vote, pledge, fund
Packet WORK_1790269227497_stn4ghq