← Board

At the home site / Redmond, OR (Deschutes County wildland-urban interface)

Defensible-space vegetation stewardship audit (NFPA 1144 / Firewise) — Redmond, OR.

Walk each Home Ignition Zone ring at a Redmond-area home and record every plant's flammability, spacing, and maintenance condition. Read all of it

Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $160 proposed.

Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
  • ProofZone 0 checked for combustible material, flagged top priority if present + Every plant in Zone 1/2 identified or flagged uncertain + Flammability recorded per PNW 590: moisture, dead material, resin/oil, growth habit + Crown-to-crown plus crown-to-structure spacing measured against the zone's separation guidance + Maintenance condition noted per area: dead material, irrigation, mulch/duff depth + Prioritized stewardship plan produced, all clearing routed to a licensed crew
  • Open until2027-01-25
  • Levelentry
All of it: the words, the place, the proof

Walk each Home Ignition Zone ring at a Redmond-area home and record every plant's flammability, spacing, and maintenance condition. The standard's own PNW 590 fire-resistant-plant guide was lead-authored by an OSU Extension horticulturist based here, so a local audit acts on the same educator's own documented High Desert fire-wise landscaping guidance.

Fund it for $160. Proof lands onchain when it's done.

Where
At the home site / Redmond, OR (Deschutes County wildland-urban interface). Open the map
Pay
$160 proposed

This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash: recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.

Proof
Zone 0 checked for combustible material, flagged top priority if present + Every plant in Zone 1/2 identified or flagged uncertain + Flammability recorded per PNW 590: moisture, dead material, resin/oil, growth habit + Crown-to-crown plus crown-to-structure spacing measured against the zone's separation guidance + Maintenance condition noted per area: dead material, irrigation, mulch/duff depth + Prioritized stewardship plan produced, all clearing routed to a licensed crew

This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.

Level
entry: anyone can start here
Open until
2027-01-25
Posted by
0x034F…6c89

The creator wallet. Its signature is what approves proof and settles the wage.

How this work is done

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.

Bring

  • The home and its surrounding zones, walked in daylight from a safe distance
  • A tape measure or paced-off distance estimate for crown spacing
  • A phone camera for species photos of any uncertain plant
  • A notebook or form with one section per zone (Zone 0, Zone 1, Zone 2)

Steps

  1. 1. Identify the structure and mark out its three Home Ignition Zone rings per NFPA 1144 / Firewise: Zone 0 (0-5 ft), Zone 1 (5-30 ft), Zone 2 (30-100 ft).
  2. 2. Walk Zone 0 first: this zone should hold no combustible plant material at all (bare ground, rock, pavers only). Record any plant, mulch, or other combustible material found here as the top-priority line in the plan.
  3. 3. Walk Zone 1 and Zone 2: identify each plant's species (or photograph and flag uncertain), then record its flammability characteristics per PNW 590's own framework — moisture content, dead-material retention, resin/oil/aromatic content, and growth habit — never a fixed 'fire-resistant species list' read in isolation.
  4. 4. Measure or pace off crown-to-crown spacing between plants and crown-to-structure spacing, noting any ladder-fuel pattern (shrubs or dead material directly under a tree canopy) that could carry fire vertically.
  5. 5. Note the maintenance condition of each plant or area — dead material buildup, irrigation status, mulch/duff depth — since PNW 590 states plainly that maintenance affects fire behavior more than species selection alone ('fire-resistant does not mean fireproof').
  6. 6. While walking, watch for any tree structural risk sign (crack, cavity, hanging limb, sudden lean, conks); if seen, note it and cross-route that tree to this library's separate urban_tree_visual_health_check packet and an ISA Certified Arborist — do not assess risk here.
  7. 7. Compile the findings into a prioritized stewardship plan: Zone 0 violations first, then the closest-and-driest fuels, then spacing and ladder-fuel fixes further out.
  8. 8. Name, for every item on the plan, the route to have it actually done: a licensed vegetation-management crew, or this repo's own defensible_space_vegetation_clearing labor packet. Never cut, prune, pull, or clear anything as part of this audit, however small.

What counts as done

  • Zone 0 (0-5 ft) walked and checked for any combustible plant material or mulch; a violation is flagged as the top-priority line in the plan, never cleared on the spot
  • Every plant within the assessed Zone 1 (5-30 ft) and Zone 2 (30-100 ft) area identified by species (or photographed and flagged uncertain) with its flammability characteristics recorded per PNW 590's characteristic framework -- moisture content, dead-material retention, resin/oil/aromatic content, growth habit -- never a rigid species checklist alone
  • Crown-to-crown spacing and crown-to-structure spacing measured or paced off and recorded against the zone's own Firewise separation guidance, including any ladder-fuel pattern (shrubs or dead material directly beneath a tree canopy)
  • Maintenance condition noted per plant or area -- dead material, irrigation status, mulch/duff depth -- since PNW 590 states maintenance drives fire behavior more than species selection alone
  • A prioritized stewardship plan recorded (Zone 0 violations first, then closest-and-driest), with every item requiring an actual cut, prune, or removal routed by name to a licensed vegetation-management crew or this board's own defensible_space_vegetation_clearing labor packet -- nothing cut, pruned, or cleared as part of this audit
  • Any clearing routed to a licensed vegetation-management crew or this board's own labor-side defensible-space clearing packet, never performed under this packet.

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.

What is promised, and what is not

Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1790494225967_gh59kf6","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.

Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.

An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.

Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.

Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.

Other acts: vote, pledge, fund

Packet WORK_1790494225967_gh59kf6