← Board

At home / Blacksburg, VA (any household, well or utility-served)

Home water sensory baseline audit (taste/odor/staining -> named test panel) — Blacksburg, VA.

Record any taste, odor, or staining sign in Blacksburg-area home water and map it to a certified-lab test. Read all of it

Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $110 proposed.

Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
  • ProofTaste, odor, staining, scale each recorded + Each sign mapped to a named lab test candidate + Extension reference table cited + No safety conclusion drawn from observation alone
  • Open until2027-01-25
  • Levelentry
All of it: the words, the place, the proof

Record any taste, odor, or staining sign in Blacksburg-area home water and map it to a certified-lab test. The program that publishes exactly this genre of land-grant extension guidance runs from here.

Fund it for $110. Proof lands onchain when it's done.

Where
At home / Blacksburg, VA (any household, well or utility-served). Open the map
Pay
$110 proposed

This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash: recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.

Proof
Taste, odor, staining, scale each recorded + Each sign mapped to a named lab test candidate + Extension reference table cited + No safety conclusion drawn from observation alone

This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.

Level
entry: anyone can start here
Open until
2027-01-25
Posted by
0x034F…6c89

The creator wallet. Its signature is what approves proof and settles the wage.

How this work is done

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.

Bring

  • The household's own tap water, observed under normal use (no special equipment required)
  • A clean glass and a well-lit sink/tub for staining observation
  • A written observation form (taste, odor, color, staining, scale)
  • An extension sign-to-test reference table (e.g. Penn State Extension's water-quality symptom guide)

Steps

  1. 1. Observe and record taste at a normal drinking temperature: metallic, salty, bitter, or none.
  2. 2. Observe and record odor, both cold and after running the hot tap: rotten-egg/sulfur, musty, chlorine-like, or none.
  3. 3. Observe and record staining: fixture/tub color (orange-brown, black, blue-green), and whether staining is on cold-water or hot-water fixtures or both.
  4. 4. Observe and record scale/hardness signs: white/gray crusting on fixtures, elevated soap use, or visible sediment.
  5. 5. Map each recorded sign to its candidate test parameter(s) per the extension reference table (e.g. metallic taste + blue-green staining -> copper/lead/corrosivity panel; rotten-egg odor -> hydrogen sulfide/sulfur bacteria; orange-brown staining -> iron; black staining -> manganese or sulfide).
  6. 6. Name the specific certified-lab test panel that matches the observed signs — this packet stops here; it does not sample water or interpret lab results itself.
  7. 7. Route the household to a certified lab for the named panel, and to the private-well-annual-screen or household-lead-screen packet when those apply, with the sensory record attached as context.

What counts as done

  • Taste, odor, staining, and scale each recorded with specific descriptors (e.g. 'metallic taste', 'rotten-egg odor when hot tap runs', 'blue-green ring in the tub')
  • Each recorded sign mapped to a named candidate test parameter, with the extension/state guide cited
  • A specific certified-lab test panel named as the next step
  • Household routed to the private-well-annual-screen or household-lead-screen packet when the signs indicate it

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.

What is promised, and what is not

Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1790539274836_vjl7g9j","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.

Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.

An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.

Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.

Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.

Other acts: vote, pledge, fund

Packet WORK_1790539274836_vjl7g9j