Red cell distribution width (RDW aging marker) — Bethesda.

Test red cell distribution width on a CBC at an accredited lab in Bethesda, MD and log it against the reference range. Kushang V. Patel, lead author of this standard's foundational meta-analysis, worked from the National Institute on Aging's own laboratory here. Red cell size variation can rise with inflammation or impaired red cell production, yet it often goes unread on a routine blood count.

Offer to pay $180. The receipt lands onchain once the proof is approved.

What it looks like

A patient near Bethesda has blood drawn at an accredited lab for a standard CBC, then reviews the red cell distribution width result against the reference range with the technician.

A description of this kind of work, not a record that it happened here.

Where

Accredited lab / clinic draw, Bethesda, MD. Open the map

Pay

$180 proposed

This job is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price, not money held for the worker. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash: recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.

Proof

RDW percent from a CBC with reference range + compared for flagging only + read alongside hemoglobin/MCV context

This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.

Level

intermediate

Open until

2027-01-26

Posted by

0x034F…6c89

The creator wallet. Its signature is what approves proof and settles the wage.

Screening only: trained staff at an accredited lab run the CBC, and the worker only logs and flags the RDW with hemoglobin and MCV. Elevated RDW, especially with abnormal hemoglobin or MCV, routes to a clinician for an anemia or nutrient workup; never diagnose.

The full safety list for this job:

• Elevated RDW, especially with abnormal hemoglobin/MCV, routes to a clinician for an anemia/nutrient workup; the agent flags, never diagnoses.
• The hazard ratios describe a specific pooled elderly population, never an individual's guaranteed risk.
• This packet is independent of and not affiliated with the National Institute on Aging or Dr. Patel: named as the real, verified institution and lead author of this standard's own foundational meta-analysis, not an endorsement or partnership.

Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment, made by the payer straight to the worker, with no Vealth fee. Paying Vealth is closed: Vealth takes no new card or wallet payment for a job. To fund a job, offer to pay the worker directly, then pay them yourself when you accept the proof, from your own wallet or by your own card or bank. From a wallet: prepare_token_offer, sign, submit_token_offer; after the proof is accepted you pay the worker on chain and the worker records it (prepare_token_settlement, or POST /labor/settle for USDC on Base). By card or bank: prepare_direct_offer, sign, submit_direct_offer; you pay the worker yourself and the worker records it with prepare_direct_settlement. Both are free, need no gas, and move no money through Vealth.

Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.

An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.

Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.

Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.