Any site with trees / London, UK: public land collection/close approach only where permitted
Lichen air-quality bioindication survey (growth-form presence/absence) — London, UK.
Survey lichen growth forms on trees near central London as a free air-quality bioindicator. Read all of it
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $115 proposed.
Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
- Proof5 to 10 trees surveyed for lichen growth form + Fruticose, foliose, crustose presence photographed per tree + Substrate, tree species recorded for context + Pollution gradient noted as possibility, never determination + Confident IDs submitted to iNaturalist or a lichen project + Uncertain IDs flagged as uncertain
- Open until2027-02-25
- Levelentry
All of it: the words, the place, the proof
Survey lichen growth forms on trees near central London as a free air-quality bioindicator. Francis Rose, co-author of the standard's own foundational 1970 lichen-zone scale, taught biogeography at King's College London here.
Offer to pay $115. The receipt lands onchain once the proof is approved.
Safety, read before you claim
This is observation and photo documentation only, and it is never represented as a calibrated air-quality index, which needs certified-lichenologist species identification. No edibility claim is made about any lichen, and a documented concern routes to public air-quality data or the local extension office.
The full safety list for this job:
- A calibrated air-quality index needs certified-lichenologist-level species identification, such as the USDA Forest Service FIA program's own annual certification standard.
- The edibility question is out of scope for this packet entirely.
- Never a substitute for checking public air-quality monitoring data or contacting the local extension or air-quality office directly, for example after an apparent lichen desert near a known emission source.
- This packet is independent of and not affiliated with King's College London or Dr. Rose: named as the real, verified institutional home of this standard's own foundational citation's co-author, not an endorsement or partnership.
How this work is done
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Bring
- camera with macro capability
- hand lens or loupe
- tape measure or diameter tape
- notebook or data sheet
- smartphone with iNaturalist app
- tree/plant ID guide or app
Steps
- 1. Select a defined sample of trees at the site (5 to 10 of the same or similar species) to control for bark chemistry differences between species.
- 2. Record the species, approximate age or trunk diameter, and GPS location of each sampled tree.
- 3. Examine the trunk from ground level up to about 2 meters, and record lichen presence or absence by growth form: fruticose (shrubby, most pollution-sensitive), foliose (leafy), and crustose (crust-like, most pollution-tolerant).
- 4. Photograph each growth form found on each tree, and photograph any tree with no lichen growth at all (a 'lichen desert') in the same way.
- 5. Note visible site context that could affect the reading independent of air quality: bark texture, tree lean, sun exposure, and proximity to a road or known emission source.
- 6. Where a lichen can be identified to species with confidence from the photo, submit it to iNaturalist (or a FunDiS/lichen-focused project) for community/expert verification, flagging any uncertain ID as such.
- 7. Record an honest note on which pollution gradient the observed pattern might reflect: an SO2-legacy lichen-desert pattern versus a nitrogen-favoring pattern (nitrophilous species dominant over sensitive species), stating this as a possibility, never a determination.
- 8. State clearly in the record that this survey does not produce a calibrated air-quality index, since that requires certified-lichenologist-level species identification.
- 9. Log all tree records, growth-form photos, and the gradient note into the proof record with date and site GPS.
What counts as done
- A defined sample (e.g. 5-10 trees of the same or similar species) surveyed for lichen presence/absence by growth form (fruticose, foliose, crustose) with photographs of each growth form found
- Substrate and tree species recorded for context (bark chemistry affects which lichens grow, independent of air quality)
- An honest note on which gradient the pattern might reflect (SO2-legacy 'lichen desert' vs nitrogen-favoring dominance of nitrophilous species) — recorded as a POSSIBILITY, never a determination
- Any confident species-level photo submitted to iNaturalist (or a FunDiS/lichen-focused project) for community/expert verification, with uncertain IDs flagged as such
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment, made by the payer straight to the worker, with no Vealth fee. Paying Vealth is closed: Vealth takes no new card or wallet payment for a job. To fund a job, offer to pay the worker directly, then pay them yourself when you accept the proof, from your own wallet or by your own card or bank. From a wallet: prepare_token_offer, sign, submit_token_offer; after the proof is accepted you pay the worker on chain and the worker records it (prepare_token_settlement, or POST /labor/settle for USDC on Base). By card or bank: prepare_direct_offer, sign, submit_direct_offer; you pay the worker yourself and the worker records it with prepare_direct_settlement. Both are free, need no gas, and move no money through Vealth.
Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.
Other acts: vote, pledge, fund
Packet WORK_1790604027395_44oqpna