TG/HDL-C ratio — free insulin-resistance signal from an existing lipid panel — Stanford.

Compute the TG to HDL-C ratio in Stanford from an existing lipid panel already on file. Gerald Reaven, senior author of this standard's own foundational citation and the researcher who first named insulin resistance's role in metabolic disease, worked at Stanford University here. A lipid panel already on file holds an unread signal of insulin resistance, and reading it the same way for everyone can mislead.

Offer to pay $80. The receipt lands onchain once the proof is approved.

What it looks like

The worker copies the triglyceride and HDL values from a lipid panel report already on file, divides them on a calculator and records the ratio with the arithmetic.

A description of this kind of work, not a record that it happened here.

Where

Telehealth / Stanford, CA (compute over an existing lipid panel). Open the map

Pay

$80 proposed

This job is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price, not money held for the worker. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash: recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.

Proof

TG (mg/dL) and HDL-C (mg/dL) from an accredited-lab lipid panel already on file + the computed ratio + the population-appropriate interpretation (or explicit non-applicability) + routing to the insulin_resistance HOMA-IR standard as the reliable alternative

This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.

Level

entry: anyone can start here

Open until

2027-03-27

Posted by

0x034F…6c89

The creator wallet. Its signature is what approves proof and settles the wage.

A free derived number, never a diagnosis; NOT interpretable for African-American women, so never used to call a Black woman not insulin resistant. Any elevated or ambiguous result routes to a clinician or HOMA-IR; no medication or supplement follows from the ratio alone.

The full safety list for this job:

• This packet is independent of and not affiliated with Stanford University or Dr. Reaven: named as the real, verified institution of this standard's own foundational citation's senior author, not an endorsement or partnership.

Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment, made by the payer straight to the worker, with no Vealth fee. Paying Vealth is closed: Vealth takes no new card or wallet payment for a job. To fund a job, offer to pay the worker directly, then pay them yourself when you accept the proof, from your own wallet or by your own card or bank. From a wallet: prepare_token_offer, sign, submit_token_offer; after the proof is accepted you pay the worker on chain and the worker records it (prepare_token_settlement, or POST /labor/settle for USDC on Base). By card or bank: prepare_direct_offer, sign, submit_direct_offer; you pay the worker yourself and the worker records it with prepare_direct_settlement. Both are free, need no gas, and move no money through Vealth.

Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.

An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.

Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.

Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.