Guelph, ON: apiaries and staging yards (managed honey bee colonies)
Varroa mite alcohol-wash (or sugar-roll) colony screen — Guelph, ON.
Sample about 300 bees for a Varroa mite wash count in Guelph-area apiaries. Read all of it
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $175 proposed.
Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
- ProofSample method recorded, alcohol wash or sugar roll + Mites per 100 bees calculated, dated with colony ID + Compared to current seasonal threshold guidance + Logged against the colony's prior mite counts + Treatment decisions routed out, never made here
- Open until2026-11-28
- Levelskilled
All of it: the words, the place, the proof
Sample about 300 bees for a Varroa mite wash count in Guelph-area apiaries. Ontario's Varroa surveillance dashboard, built from ministry inspection data, was developed at the University of Guelph, and a keeper's own count adds a real number to that picture.
Offer to pay $175. The receipt lands onchain once the proof is approved.
Safety, read before you claim
This is colony-level population monitoring only, and it never selects a miticide product, dose, or treatment timing. Never wash the queen: confirm she is set aside before sampling, and high-density bloom conditions raise mite and virus spread risk between operations.
The full safety list for this job:
- Treatment stays under label law plus cooperative-extension or state-apiarist guidance.
- Record high-density findings to inform the keeper's own biosecurity practice, never as a directive to other operations.
- This packet is independent of and not affiliated with the University of Guelph, the Ontario government or the dashboard authors: named as the real, verified home of published Ontario surveillance work, not an endorsement or partnership. A keeper's single count never stands in for provincial inspection.
How this work is done
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Bring
- A wide-mouth jar with a mesh/screened lid, or a purpose-built easy-check-style device, for the alcohol wash
- 70%+ isopropyl alcohol (or windshield-washer fluid) to cover the sample, OR powdered sugar for the non-lethal sugar-roll alternative
- A level 1/2-cup (~300-bee) scoop and a white sorting pan/tray for counting mites against a white background
- The colony's own hive records and prior mite-count history for trend
Steps
- 1. Select a frame of open brood from within the brood nest — mites concentrate on nurse bees near open brood, not on bees from a honey super.
- 2. Shake or brush bees from the frame into a collection container, checking briefly for the queen and setting her aside unharmed BEFORE sampling.
- 3. Scoop a level 1/2-cup sample (about 300 bees) into the wash jar.
- 4. For an alcohol wash: cover the bees with 70%+ isopropyl alcohol, seal, and shake vigorously 30-60 seconds to dislodge mites. For a sugar roll: add about 2 tbsp powdered sugar, roll to coat, wait about 2 minutes, then shake through the mesh lid over a white pan.
- 5. Pour the wash through the mesh into the white pan and count every dislodged mite against the white background.
- 6. Divide the mite count by the number of bees sampled (~300) and multiply by 100 to get mites per 100 bees; record the result with sample date, frame/location, and colony ID.
- 7. Compare the count against the Coalition's current seasonal action-threshold guidance and Varroa Management Decision Tool; record the comparison as a flag, never a treatment choice.
- 8. Log the round against the colony's prior counts to track trend, and set the next sampling date.
What counts as done
- Sample drawn from an open-brood frame with the queen confirmed set aside first; wash method (alcohol or sugar roll) recorded
- ~300-bee (level 1/2-cup) sample counted and mites-per-100-bees calculated, dated with colony ID and pre-/post-bloom timing noted
- Result compared to the Coalition's current seasonal threshold guidance / Varroa Management Decision Tool, recorded as a flag only
- Comparison logged against the colony's prior mite-count rounds and, where known, against neighboring-yard density context
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment, made by the payer straight to the worker, with no Vealth fee. Paying Vealth is closed: Vealth takes no new card or wallet payment for a job. To fund a job, offer to pay the worker directly, then pay them yourself when you accept the proof, from your own wallet or by your own card or bank. From a wallet: prepare_token_offer, sign, submit_token_offer; after the proof is accepted you pay the worker on chain and the worker records it (prepare_token_settlement, or POST /labor/settle for USDC on Base). By card or bank: prepare_direct_offer, sign, submit_direct_offer; you pay the worker yourself and the worker records it with prepare_direct_settlement. Both are free, need no gas, and move no money through Vealth.
Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.
Other acts: vote, pledge, fund
Packet WORK_1790647640910_s9t1q27