school modernization site, Panorama City, Los Angeles CA
Screen for silica dust exposure.
A safety technician in an N95 respirator photographs the wet-cutting setup at school modernization site. The site's silica controls now have a photographic record. Read all of it
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $528 proposed.
Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
- Proofphoto per checklist section + GPS + silica_dust_exposure findings log
- Open until2026-10-30
- Leveladvanced
All of it: the words, the place, the proof
Screen the school modernization site in Panorama City, Los Angeles CA for silica dust exposure controls. The site cuts and grinds concrete and masonry with no documented silica exposure-control check.
Fund it for $528. Proof lands onchain when it's done.
How this work is done
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Bring
- respiratory protection per the site exposure control plan (N95/half-mask)
- tablet/clipboard with the 1926.1153 Table 1 checklist
- camera
- note on the written exposure control plan + fit-test/medical-clearance references
- flashlight
Steps
- 1. Check in with the competent person; confirm a written exposure control plan exists and list the silica-generating tasks on site (cutting/grinding/drilling/chipping concrete, masonry, or stone). Observe-and-document only.
- 2. Match each task to OSHA Table 1 and photograph whether the specified engineering control is in use, integrated water delivery (wet cutting) or a dust-collection/HEPA shroud.
- 3. Verify respiratory protection matches the Table 1 requirement for the task and duration (e.g., N95 / half-mask APF-10) and that workers are wearing it; note any fit-test/medical-clearance the plan references.
- 4. Check housekeeping: confirm NO dry sweeping or compressed-air cleaning of settled dust, wet methods or a HEPA vacuum must be used.
- 5. Record the exposure zone: signage, who is inside the dust zone, and whether unprotected workers or bystanders are exposed.
- 6. Tier each finding against the Table 1 requirement (stop-work / correct-before-proceed / monitor) and name the responsible competent person.
- 7. Enter photos, GPS/address, the Table 1 checklist, plan status, and the tiered findings; sign. Route stop-work items to the competent person and any suspected exceedance to an industrial hygienist.
What counts as done
- Photo evidence at school modernization site with timestamp
- GPS / address confirm
- Task/exposure-control inventory per Table 1
- Water-suppression/vacuum-LEV presence check
- Respiratory-protection status log
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1790730709144_7iuagwv","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
Open, but not claimable yet. restricted: regulated. Regulated or permit-required work cannot be claimed on this rail yet. It stays readable; voting and pledging are free, and funding is separate from claiming.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.
Other acts: vote, pledge, fund
Packet WORK_1790730709144_7iuagwv