Document the moisture sources behind a musty bathroom on the 1500 block of El Paso St (public right-of-way + typical residential conditions), San Antonio, TX 78207.

Document the moisture sources behind the musty bathroom on the 1500 block of El Paso St, San Antonio. Read all of it

Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $480 proposed.

Vote for it

Proof it takes, the deadline, the level

Proofmoisture-source photo map + humidity/moisture readings + measured mold-extent inventory vs the EPA 10-sq-ft threshold + the moisture-first sequenced plan
Open until2026-10-30
Levelintermediate

All of it: the words, the place, the proof

Document the moisture sources behind the musty bathroom on the 1500 block of El Paso St, San Antonio. The bathroom in this house smells musty every humid San Antonio morning and nobody has traced the water. This packet documents every moisture source found and photographed, mold measured against the EPA professional threshold, and a moisture-first plan that fixes the water before anyone pays for remediation.

Fund it for $480. Proof lands onchain when it's done.

Where: Sa Elpaso, the 1500 block of El Paso St (public right-of-way + typical residential conditions), San Antonio, TX 78207. Open the map
Pay: $480 proposed
This packet is not funded yet, so this figure is a proposed price and not money waiting in escrow. If a buyer funds it, approved proof settles that price onchain. If nobody funds it, approved proof earns provable credit toward the work instead of cash: recorded, and readable any time at vealth.net/labor/credit/(your wallet). You see which before you claim, never after.
Proof: moisture-source photo map + humidity/moisture readings + measured mold-extent inventory vs the EPA 10-sq-ft threshold + the moisture-first sequenced plan
This is exactly what gets it approved. Nothing settles without it.
Level: intermediate
Open until: 2026-10-30
Posted by: 0x034F…6c89
The creator wallet. Its signature is what approves proof and settles the wage.

How this work is done

A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.

Bring

camera
pin/pinless moisture meter
hygrometer (indoor relative humidity by room)
flashlight (attic/crawl/basement/under-sink)
tape measure (visible-mold extent vs the EPA 10-sq-ft threshold)
N95 respirator + nitrile gloves (surveyor protection, no disturbance)

Steps

1. Start with the household's experience: where it smells musty, who has symptoms, when it started, what flooding/leak history the home has. Their answers target the survey: this is their claim of a dry, breathable home.
2. Hunt moisture sources room by room and in attic/crawl/basement: active leaks (roof, plumbing, windows), condensation surfaces, grade/drainage problems at the foundation, bath/kitchen/dryer exhaust termination, and HVAC condensate; photograph each and take moisture-meter readings at suspect assemblies.
3. Record indoor relative humidity by room (target <60%, ideally 30-50% per EPA) and note dehumidification or ventilation gaps.
4. Document visible mold WITHOUT disturbing it: location, surface/material, and measured extent per patch, classed against the EPA threshold (under ~10 sq ft = careful DIY-cleanable per EPA guidance; over = professional remediation).
5. Build the moisture-first sequence: fix the water FIRST (each source mapped to the right trade: roofer, plumber, drainage), then dry, then remediate, then rebuild; mark what the household can safely do (small-area cleanup per EPA steps, humidity control) vs what routes to pros.
6. Enter photos, GPS/address, the moisture-source map, humidity/moisture readings, the mold extent inventory, and the sequenced plan; sign. Real (found and measured), Proven (photo+GPS+signature), One-of-one (this home's water, this family's air).

What counts as done

Household symptom/odor/leak history in their own words
Photo map of every found moisture source with moisture-meter readings at suspect assemblies
Room relative-humidity log vs the EPA <60% guidance
Visible-mold inventory: location, material, measured extent, EPA-threshold class

Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.

What is promised, and what is not

Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1790777422754_d6t3290","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.

Open, but not claimable yet. restricted: regulated. Regulated or permit-required work cannot be claimed on this rail yet. It stays readable; voting and pledging are free, and funding is separate from claiming.

An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.

Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.

Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.

Other acts: vote, pledge, fund

Pledge backing, free Fund this work, $480

Packet WORK_1790777422754_d6t3290