public streets, river greenway paths and city parks, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, CA
Publish this month's drought stage and restriction notice for Los Angeles, CA.
Write one plain page naming this month's drought stage and watering restrictions for Los Angeles. Read all of it
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $80 proposed.
Proof it takes, the deadline, the level
- Proofthe stage with its effective date + the restrictions quoted with citations + the source status in the agency's words + the next stage trigger + the notice's anchor hash
- Open until2026-12-13
- Levelentry
All of it: the words, the place, the proof
Write one plain page naming this month's drought stage and watering restrictions for Los Angeles. The stage a town is in and the day it may water stay unknown to most people, though the answer is public. Each month, read what the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and the California State Water Resources Control Board and the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board have published, and record the current stage under the city's recycled water goal and the Los Angeles County Safe Clean Water Program funded by Measure W of 2018, the restrictions it puts on outdoor watering and on any exempt use, the date it took effect, the status of the Los Angeles Aqueduct from the Owens Valley, Metropolitan Water District imports from the Colorado River and the State Water Project, San Fernando basin groundwater, and recycled water in the agency's own words, and what would move the stage up or down. Quote, cite and date every line. Publish it and hand it to the library, the school and the neighborhood group, and never add advice the agency did not give.
Offer to pay $80. The receipt lands onchain once the proof is approved.
Safety, read before you claim
Desk work from public records, with no site visit required or implied and no license or supervision asked for. The notice republishes the agency's words with citations and never adds advice, interpretation or a declaration about whether the supply is adequate.
How this work is done
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Bring
- the utility's drought or conservation stage page and any adopted order or ordinance behind it
- the state or basin agency's current source status report, reservoir level or index well reading
- a plain text or single page template with a citation line under every claim
- a hashing tool for the anchor step
- the contact for the library, school or neighborhood group receiving the copy
Steps
- 1. Read the utility's own stage page and the order, ordinance or resolution behind it, and record the stage, its effective date and the document reference with the date read.
- 2. Quote the restrictions exactly as published, including watering days and hours, any exemption, and any penalty, each with its own citation. Do not paraphrase a restriction into simpler words.
- 3. Record the source's status in the agency's own words, quoted, with the reservoir level, index well reading or allocation percent the agency rests it on, and the date of that figure.
- 4. Record what would move the stage up or down, in the rule's own terms, so a reader can watch the same trigger the agency watches.
- 5. Write the page in plain language around those quotes, adding no advice the agency did not give, no interpretation and no statement about whether the supply is adequate.
- 6. Publish the page, hash it, anchor the hash via vealth.net/anchor, and deliver a copy to the named library, school or neighborhood group, recording the date and the channel.
What counts as done
- The current stage, its effective date, and the utility or agency page or order it comes from, with the date read
- The restrictions quoted as published, including watering days and hours and any exemption, each with its citation
- The status of the source in the agency's own words, quoted, with the reservoir level, index well reading or allocation percent it rests on
- The notice published and its content hash anchored via vealth.net/anchor, plus where a copy was delivered
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment, made by the payer straight to the worker, with no Vealth fee. Paying Vealth is closed: Vealth takes no new card or wallet payment for a job. To fund a job, offer to pay the worker directly, then pay them yourself when you accept the proof, from your own wallet or by your own card or bank. From a wallet: prepare_token_offer, sign, submit_token_offer; after the proof is accepted you pay the worker on chain and the worker records it (prepare_token_settlement, or POST /labor/settle for USDC on Base). By card or bank: prepare_direct_offer, sign, submit_direct_offer; you pay the worker yourself and the worker records it with prepare_direct_settlement. Both are free, need no gas, and move no money through Vealth.
Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.
Other acts: vote, pledge, fund
Packet WORK_1794601099093_m1prg42