Institutional concept · Not affiliated · Passive recon only · Unlisted
Autodesk's software designs what gets built. Frontier funds the distant tonnes. Nobody proves the field work in between.
In one sentence: Autodesk runs its own operations on 100% renewable energy and SBTi-validated targets, and has bought into Frontier Climate's durable-removal coalition since 2023, real commitments, credited here in full. What neither Autodesk's design software nor Frontier's offtake ledger can show is whether the physical work modeled in Revit or BIM 360 actually happened on site, on spec, on schedule: the exact gap EWP's photo-plus-GPS-plus-signature proof packet is built to close.
Relationship, stated plainlyEcoWealth is not affiliated with Autodesk in any way: not a customer, partner, reseller, Forge/APS developer partner, or Frontier co-buyer. No contact has been made with Autodesk, its Foundation, or Frontier Climate on Autodesk's behalf. Everything here is independent, unsolicited desk research built entirely from Autodesk's own public pages plus our earlier, independently-verified Frontier Climate research.
Read this first. Independent research by EcoWealth Corporation. Not requested, produced, reviewed, or endorsed by Autodesk or any named affiliate. Every figure below is drawn from Autodesk's own public pages plus a small set of independently re-verified HTTP checks, no scanning, fuzzing, application, sign-up, or contact anywhere. Staged locally, noindex, not sent to anyone without explicit operator review.
The whole thing, plainly
What we found: Autodesk's own renewable-energy and emissions numbers are real and credited in full: the honest gap is that nothing proves the physical work its software models (a pour, a weld, a punch-list walk-through) actually happened on site, on the day the model said it would.
What we built, free: nothing installed here, this is a passive recon note plus one clearly-labeled concept, not a product handoff.
The ask: none. This is unsolicited desk research, not a pitch, and no one at Autodesk has been contacted.
Four facts from the public record
Credit-first: Autodesk's own operational numbers are real and independently checkable. One context note on Frontier, one honest agent-discovery gap.
100% renewable energy, 2nd year of neutralized emissions
Verbatim from autodesk.com/sustainability: facilities, cloud services, events, and employee work-from-home run on 100% renewable energy; GHG emissions neutralized across operations and value chain “for the second year in a row” via the Autodesk Carbon Fund.
SBTi-validated targets (validated FY2021)
−50% absolute Scope 1+2 emissions by FY2031 vs. a FY2020 baseline; −55% Scope 3 (purchased goods/services, fuel & energy, business travel, commuting) per dollar of gross profit over the same window.
Frontier member since 2023: deal-level, not member-level, transparency
One of only 10 named logos on Frontier's own current roster (confirmed in our own earlier research). Frontier discloses 18 offtake deals down to the dollar and tonne, but not each member's individual share.
Real security.txt; llms.txt and agent-card.json both true 404
Verified with a full browser UA after the bare-curl UA was bot-blocked (403 across the board, including a control path), controlled for before concluding llms.txt (the file AI assistants read first) and agent-card.json (the file that lets an AI assistant use you correctly) are genuine, byte-matched 404s.
The note, in two pages
This page
The cover
Relationship framing, four facts, and the one honest EWP concept, everything needed in sixty seconds.
Capability brief
Design software, removal ledger, and the field-proof gap
Four evidenced findings: Autodesk's own renewable-energy and SBTi numbers credited verbatim, the Frontier deal-vs-member transparency gap named precisely, and the agent-discovery check run twice (once bot-blocked, once controlled) before calling it real.
Isn't: a partnership pitch, a proposal, or a claim of affiliation, contract, membership, procurement relationship, or contact with Autodesk or any named partner.
Is: credit-first, evidence-led desk research plus one honest, clearly-labeled EWP intersection concept, never a claim that Autodesk has seen, requested, or endorsed any of it.
Autodesk's tools model the building; Frontier's ledger prices the distant tonnes it takes to offset one. Neither one carries a photo-and-signature receipt that the actual pour, weld, or punch-list walk-through happened on the day the model said it would. That's the layer EWP's proof packet is built to sit underneath, not replace.
