Concept demo · Independent · Not a Bechtel product · Mock data only

Act 1: ask if it was safe. Act 2: prove it.

Act 1 is the reality today: an owner's AI asks Bechtel's public surface whether a task was done safely, and gets a PDF hunt. Act 2 is the concept this engagement proposes: the same task as a safety-verified work packet, hazard-gated before anyone's hands touch it, proof-checked at completion, settled to a public receipt.

Concept mock. Act 1 paraphrases the outcome of reading Bechtel's real public pages (prose safety commitments, no verifiable object). All names, tasks, and receipts in Act 2 are fabricated demonstrations running EcoWealth's packet format. Not affiliated with or endorsed by Bechtel.
Owner's project AI: "Bechtel's page says the goal is zero recordable incidents and the 2023 RIR is 0.163. For the trench pour on Grid 14 yesterday, was the protective system inspected before entry, by a competent person? Can I verify it?"
Reading bechtel.com/approach/ (today)The public surface states the commitment ("everyone returns home safely") and the aggregate rate. For the specific task, there is no machine-readable object here. You'd request the inspection log through project controls, if it was filed and can be found.source: /approach/ (prose) · ld+json = 1 (Yoast graph only)
"So the number is auditable in aggregate, but the task is not."
Owner's project AICorrect. There is no per-task verifiable safe-completion receipt on the public surface.
Commitment stated. Proof: that's Act 2. →
This is not vaporware: walk the real path today. The packet engine, hazard gate, proof-checker, and on-chain settlement all run now on EcoWealth's own work board: live walkthrough at vealth.net/receipts/building-agent-demo/ · contract 0x76c17C…A14B on BaseScan · live board counters at vealth.net/labor/stats · agent pricing at vealth.net/.well-known/x402 (work-packet $0.10 · work-proof-check $0.01).
Provisioned by EcoWealth · Digital Provisioning Protocol · provenance‑sealed