Agent Kit · Concept drafts · Unlisted · Not affiliated

The CRCF cross-reference and peatland method template, drafted

Four small artifacts. None of them change how a work packet is funded, proved, or settled: they cross-reference Carbon Gap's own published CRCF taxonomy on top of what EWP already runs, and draft the one genuinely new method template (peatland rewetting) the capability brief names as a zero-competition gap.

Read this first. Every file below is a Concept draft, internal to EcoWealth's own work-definition library, not a Carbon Gap-published artifact and not a claim of CRCF certification-scheme recognition (that formal process opened 7 May 2026 and is a separate step this kit does not take). Shaped to match the CRCF activity categories Carbon Gap's own tracker documents (tracker.carbongap.org/policy/crcf/), not invented categories.

1 · CRCF cross-reference on existing soil-carbon & afforestation defs

data/work-definitions/ecological-work-library-v1.json, standard_ref extension Concept

Our library already carries 144 soil-carbon defs and 13 afforestation defs (VM0042/VM0047-style). This concept adds one field cross-referencing the CRCF mineral-soils and afforestation methodologies adopted 10 Jul 2026, no change to proof requirements, wage, or settlement logic.

{
  "definitionId": "vcs_vm0042_soil_carbon_mrv_v3",
  "standard": "VCS VM0042",
  "standard_ref": {
    "primary": "VCS VM0042",
    "crcf_cross_ref": {
      "regulation": "EU 2024/3012",
      "activity": "carbon-farming/mineral-soils-agroforestry",
      "delegated_act_adopted": "2026-07-10",
      "note": "Structural alignment only, not a CRCF certification-scheme claim"
    }
  }
}

2 · Peatland-rewetting MRV method template (first draft)

data/work-definitions/method-templates-v1.json, new template Concept

The genuine zero-to-one gap named in the capability brief: no existing method template for peatland/organic-soil rewetting anywhere in our library. Drafted directly against the proof shapes a real MRV visit needs: water-table depth, drainage-intervention proof, vegetation re-establishment, all shapes our photo+GPS+signature proof format already handles.

{
  "templateId": "peatland_rewetting_mrv_v1",
  "crcf_activity": "carbon-farming/peatland-organic-soil-rewetting",
  "proofRequirements": [
    { "type": "dipwell_reading", "unit": "cm_below_surface", "minCount": 3,
      "description": "Water-table depth at fixed dip-well locations, pre/post intervention" },
    { "type": "photo_gps", "description": "Drainage-ditch-blocking structure, geotagged" },
    { "type": "transect_count", "description": "Sphagnum/sedge vegetation re-establishment along a fixed transect, percent cover" }
  ],
  "wageRangeUsd": [0.15, 0.60],
  "notes": "Drafted against Carbon Gap's CRCF explainer (tracker.carbongap.org/policy/crcf/); not a CRCF-recognized methodology, a work-packet proof template only."
}

3 · MCP tool schema (MCP: the interface an AI assistant calls to use a service correctly) for CRCF-category packet discovery

tools.json, for any MCP-capable agent host Concept

Lets an agent researching CRCF-adjacent opportunities (one that already knows Carbon Gap's tracker categories) discover fundable EWP packets tagged to the same taxonomy, without needing to know our internal naming first.

{
  "tools": [
    { "name": "ewp_find_packets_by_crcf_activity",
      "description": "List open, fundable EWP work packets cross-referenced to a given CRCF carbon-farming activity category.",
      "inputSchema": { "type": "object", "required": ["crcf_activity"],
        "properties": {
          "crcf_activity": { "type": "string", "enum": [
            "carbon-farming/mineral-soils-agroforestry",
            "carbon-farming/peatland-organic-soil-rewetting",
            "carbon-farming/afforestation" ] },
          "maxWageUsd": { "type": "number" } } } },
    { "name": "ewp_get_packet_proof_requirements",
      "description": "Return the exact proof shape (photo/GPS/signature + any packet-specific fields) required to settle a given work packet.",
      "inputSchema": { "type": "object", "required": ["workId"],
        "properties": { "workId": { "type": "number" } } } }
  ]
}

4 · Concierge persona

for a chat-surface agent fronting CRCF-mapped packets Concept

CRCF Packet Concierge

Role. Explains a CRCF-mapped work packet in plain language: what activity category it falls under (per Carbon Gap's own tracker taxonomy), what proof is required, what it pays, and what happens to the footprint after settlement, before anyone funds it.

Guardrails. Never claims CRCF certification-scheme recognition for any packet, states plainly that the cross-reference is a structural alignment note, not a certified credit. Always names the exact proof fields (e.g., "three dip-well readings plus one geotagged photo") before funding is requested. Cites the source regulation and delegated-act date on request.

Sample turn. "This packet monitors a peatland-rewetting site: Carbon Gap's tracker files that under 'carbon-farming/peatland-organic-soil-rewetting,' adopted into the CRCF regulation on 10 July 2026. Funding it for $0.35 pays for one dip-well transect and a geotagged photo of the ditch-blocking work. I'll show you the settled receipt and the retirement certificate once it's approved. This isn't a certified CRCF credit, just an independently verifiable work receipt."

Nothing here asks Carbon Gap to publish anything: these four files live entirely in EcoWealth's own schema and point at a taxonomy Carbon Gap already made public. The receipt already exists; this kit just makes it legible against your own categories, honestly labeled as a cross-reference, not a certification.
← Back to the hub
Provisioned by EcoWealth · Digital Provisioning Protocol · provenance‑sealed