Every artifact below is a concept draft, not a real Carbonfuture-facing file. They exist to make the "last-mile field-capture layer" idea concrete: what would a generic agent actually call, and what would it be told never to claim?
A generic Agent-to-Agent discovery card for EWP's own field-capture role, deliberately scoped to say what EWP does NOT claim, not just what it does.
{
"name": "EWP Field-Capture Agent",
"description": "Funds and settles bounded ecological-labor work packets on-chain (Base mainnet). Proves that a task happened, by whom, where: photo + geofenced GPS + one-time signature. Does NOT measure carbon quantity, durability, or issue any credit. Not affiliated with Carbonfuture, Puro.earth, or Isometric.",
"version": "0.1.0-concept",
"capabilities": {
"streaming": false,
"pushNotifications": false
},
"skills": [
{
"id": "submit-field-evidence-packet",
"description": "Attach a settled EWP work packet as a field-observation input to an external evidence bundle. Output is a photo+GPS+signature proof reference and an on-chain settlement tx hash; NOT a carbon measurement.",
"outputModes": ["application/json"]
},
{
"id": "fund-adjacent-labor-packet",
"description": "Fund a small, bounded labor task (feedstock collection, site prep, maintenance) near a named project or plant. Settles in USDC on Base, sub-dollar to low-dollar per packet.",
"outputModes": ["application/json"]
}
],
"disclaimer": "This agent card is a concept draft prepared unilaterally by EcoWealth Corporation. No relationship with Carbonfuture, Puro.earth, or Isometric is claimed or implied."
}
Two tool shapes an agent already fluent in Carbonfuture's own dMRV vocabulary (batch, dossier, proof point) could call, scoped narrowly, each returning a disclaimer field by default.
{
"tools": [
{
"name": "submit_field_evidence_packet",
"description": "Submit one EWP-settled field-observation packet (photo+GPS+signature) as a candidate line item for an external batch dossier. Returns a proof reference and settlement hash. Does not assert carbon quantity or durability.",
"input_schema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"batch_id": {"type": "string", "description": "External dossier/batch identifier this observation supports"},
"task_description": {"type": "string"},
"location": {"type": "object", "properties": {"lat": {"type": "number"}, "lng": {"type": "number"}}}
},
"required": ["task_description", "location"]
}
},
{
"name": "fund_adjacent_labor_packet",
"description": "Fund one bounded ecological-labor packet (sub-dollar to low-dollar, USDC on Base) near a named project or plant awaiting financing. Never funds equity, mezzanine, or project-finance rounds.",
"input_schema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"project_ref": {"type": "string", "description": "Public name/URL of the adjacent project (e.g. a named missing-middle plant)"},
"task_type": {"type": "string", "enum": ["feedstock_collection", "site_prep", "maintenance", "invasive_species_clearing"]},
"budget_usdc": {"type": "number", "maximum": 25}
},
"required": ["task_type", "budget_usdc"]
}
}
]
}
Not proposed for any Carbonfuture domain: this is what EWP's own llms.txt could say about this exact boundary, matching the honest-gap finding in the capability brief (Carbonfuture itself currently ships no llms.txt at all).
# EWP: Ecological Work Protocol > Funds and settles bounded, real-world ecological-labor work packets > on-chain (Base mainnet, contract 0x76c17C51336BE7B39F5164802e08b9811477A14B). > Proof = photo + geofenced GPS + one-time signature. Settlement is on-chain, > same transaction as proof acceptance. ## What EWP is NOT - Not a carbon-credit registry or standard (see Puro.earth, Isometric, CSI, Verra) - Not a dMRV provider for carbon quantity or durability (see Carbonfuture MRV+) - Does not issue, sell, or broker any carbon credit ## What EWP could plausibly feed A batch-level dMRV dossier, as ONE field-observation input among many, never as a substitute for accredited-lab or VVB-reviewed data. ## Read more - /labor/stats: live board counts - /work: the work board
A narrow-scope conversational persona for any agent that reaches EWP asking about carbon-credit eligibility. Its entire job is redirecting correctly, not overselling.
Every response this persona gives defaults to naming the boundary before naming the capability: the opposite failure mode of most "agent-ready" marketing copy.
