Independent read · Not affiliated · Passive recon only · Unlisted

CDR.fyi is the reference dataset for durable carbon removal. We're not in it, and we're not asking to be.

CDR.fyi tracks nearly $12.4B and ~49.4M tonnes of durable (100+ year permanence, engineered) carbon removal across biochar, DACCS, BECCS, enhanced weathering, mineralization, and marine CDR, real market data, credited in full below. EcoWealth's own retirements settle a different credit class (nature-based, sub-100-year, via Klima/Regen Network) at sub-cent micro-scale, which their own methodology structurally excludes on two independent grounds. This page states that plainly, then offers two small, honest ideas about making CDR.fyi's already-good public data more agent-consumable, not a pitch for inclusion.

Not affiliated. Not eligible for their tracker. Stated up front, not buried. CDR.fyi's own public methodology page says it plainly: docs.cdr.fyi/methodology: "CDR.fyi aggregates purchases, deliveries, and verifications of carbon removed and stored for +100 years." EcoWealth's retirements run through Klima's Retirement Aggregator against a Regen-CFC (nature-based) carbon class, a sub-100-year-permanence instrument by definition, at a 5-cent micro-retirement scale, a fraction of a fraction of the whole-tonne unit their entire schema, pricing vocabulary, and API are built around. Two independent gates, either one sufficient on its own. This package does not propose crossing them.
The whole thing, plainly
CDR.fyi runs one of the most honest agent-facing sites we've reviewed: real 404s, an honest paywall gate, no fakes anywhere. We built two small free concepts: a public stats file and a price-context object, both using only data they already call free. We're not asking to join their tracker, different credit class, different scale, stated plainly.
Read this first. Independent recon by EcoWealth Corporation. Not requested, produced, reviewed, or endorsed by CDR.fyi. Every observation below is a passive read of public pages and public, documented, free/unauthenticated GET requests (llms.txt, robots.txt, standard well-known paths, one honest-401 API probe with zero credentials supplied): no scanning, fuzzing, auth bypass, sign-up, or state-changing call. Captured 2026-07-16; every URL below is independently re-runnable. This package is staged locally, noindex, and not sent anywhere without explicit review.

Six facts from the public record

Credit-first, because the credit is real and unusually clean. Each fact is reproducible with one command: the capability brief has the exact curl lines and byte counts.

A genuinely excellent llms.txt (the file AI assistants read first)
Real (200, 3,827 B), and it explicitly tells AI systems not to cite the gated Portal/API as freely accessible, rare, honest AI-citation governance.
No soft-200 desert: true 404s, byte-for-byte
agent-card.json (the file that lets an AI assistant use a service correctly), .well-known/x402 (a web-native way for AI agents to pay per use), ai.txt, security.txt all true-404 at 28,695 B, identical to a nonsense-path control. Status tells the truth.
The API gate is honest, not fake
api.cdr.fyi/v1/orders returns a real, versioned 401 "Unauthorized: Invalid write key" with zero credentials sent, genuine auth, not a soft-200.
The one narrow gap
Even the data llms.txt calls "free to access, no login required" (leaderboards, market-update headlines) has no machine-readable schema: an agent has to scrape rendered JSON to get numbers CDR.fyi already says are public.
Why we're out of scope: in their own words
"+100 years" permanence, whole-tonne schema. Our Regen-CFC micro-retirements clear neither gate. Stated plainly, not litigated.
A genuine public good underneath it
The CDR.fyi × OPIS pricing survey ($143/mt biochar breakeven, $670/mt DACCS, gap narrowing $107→$98/mt) is a credible, citable price anchor for anyone building agent tools in this space, attributed, not scraped.

The note, in three pages

Capability brief

An agent's-eye read of CDR.fyi's public + gated surface

Six evidenced findings: the excellent llms.txt, the true-404 discipline, the honest API gate, the one schema gap in the free data, the durability/scale mismatch stated in full, and the pricing survey as public good, each with the exact URL, status, and re-check command.

Read the brief
Demo: shown, not told

What just happened, and what a small addition would look like

Act one: the real, live probe run for this brief: llms.txt, the true-404s, the honest 401, nothing mocked. Act two: two small concept additions: a public-only stats manifest for the data CDR.fyi already calls free, and an agent-readable price-context object built from their own published, attributed benchmark numbers.

See the demo
Agent kit

The concept files, drafted

A public-only agent-card.json and MCP tool schemas covering just the free leaderboard/market-update data, a "Durable-CDR Price-Context Concierge" persona that always attributes and never claims affiliation, and the give-to-get vs. free-proof comparison in full.

Open the kit

Two transparency philosophies, side by side

Not a comparison meant to declare a winner: CDR.fyi's model and EcoWealth's model solve different problems, and both are defensible.

CDR.fyi: give-to-get

Public pages (homepage, leaderboards, blog, methodology) are free for anyone, including AI systems: llms.txt says so explicitly. The deeper layer (full order-level history, bulk export, API keys) is earned by contributing your own real transaction data through the Partner Portal, or bought via a paid Team+ tier. Depth is the reward for reciprocity.

EcoWealth: free-proof

Every proof artifact (a settled work packet, a retirement receipt, a contract address) is free and keyless to read, always: reads never gate. Only the write action (claiming work, posting a packet) carries a nominal cost (an EWP key, or five cents via x402). Depth is never withheld; only the act of adding new proof has a floor.

The proof stack behind the framing (live today)

EWP contract 0x76c17C…A14B settles real-world ecological labor on Base mainnet; a share of settled work retires carbon through Klima's gasless relay and the Retirement Aggregator against a Regen-CFC (nature-based, community-forestry) carbon class, the exact instrument CDR.fyi's own "+100 years" durability rule excludes by design, at a micro-retirement scale CDR.fyi's whole-tonne schema has no field for. Neither of those is a defect in either system; it's why this note proposes making CDR.fyi's public data more agent-legible, not proposing our retirements join their tracker.
CDR.fyi earned its reference-dataset reputation the hard way: real methodology, an honest citation policy, true 404s where every peer protocol we've reviewed soft-200s. The ask here isn't "let us in." It's "the free data you already say is free deserves one small machine-readable door."
Provisioned by EcoWealth · Digital Provisioning Protocol · provenance‑sealed