Plain thesis: Act One is Oimpact's own "Eco" template exactly as it's described on-site today: a payment mints an RWI (Real-World Impact) token with no independent proof of the field work behind the credit. Act Two is the one concept addition: a funded, proof-verified EWP work packet supplying that missing evidence, then handing its receipt to the same mint. Everything here is a concept illustration. EcoWealth has no live integration with Oimpact; nothing below was actually run against Oimpact's systems.
Per Oimpact's own on-site copy: "Funds verified carbon removal via climate.0g.ai. Every transaction is fully traceable end to end and fully tradable end to end. Mints RWI per tonne removed." No separate verification step for the underlying labor is described.
The marketplace flow (oimpact.ai/catalog) is: pick an opportunity → buy through an agent → everyone earns. Revenue splits $90 to the provider, $9 to the agent owner, $1 to the RWI Treasury per $100.
The proof Oimpact documents for this template is the payment's own transaction hash: evidence that money moved, not independent evidence that the tonne of carbon the money is meant to fund was actually monitored, planted, or surveyed on the ground.
Per the live formula on oimpact.ai/rwi: I(C) = max(1, 100 × (1 − C/$100M)²). At genesis, $100 of verified impact mints ~10,000 RWI.
Nothing about Oimpact's payment, its bonding curve, or its payout split changes here. The only addition: before the mint happens, a bounded EWP work packet pays for and proves the field labor a City-Forest-Credit-class retirement actually depends on, then that packet's on-chain settlement receipt becomes the "evidence" field Oimpact's own whitepaper already asks for.
RWI mint evidence field (concept, as documented):
{
"type": "tx_hash",
"value": "0x4f21...c08a",
"proves": "a payment moved"
}
# proves money moved.
# says nothing about whether
# the field work behind the
# credit actually happened.
RWI mint evidence field (concept addition):
{
"type": "ewp_settlement",
"workId": 41822,
"proof": "photo + GPS + signature",
"settlementTx": "0x7f2c...9ab1",
"chain": "base-mainnet",
"contract": "0x76c17C...A14B",
"retiredVia": "klima-regen-rail"
}
# proves a specific, located,
# signed-off unit of field labor
# happened, the thing the
# credit requires to exist at all.
This concept changes nothing about how Oimpact's marketplace, payout split, or bonding curve work today, it only proposes a richer "evidence" object for the exact field the whitepaper already names, sourced from a work-packet lifecycle (fund → claim → prove → settle → retire) that already runs, live, on Base mainnet.
→ See the drafted files themselves in the Agent Kit
← Back to the hub