regen-1generated 2026-09-13 09:17 UTCpublic chain data, three sources agreeing

regen compute / retirement tracker

A retirement is an ecocredit taken out of circulation for good, the thing a Regen Compute subscription exists to do. Every number below is an on-chain event, counted once, agreed by two independent nodes and the registry's own indexer before it is written here.

0retirements, trailing 90 days
stalledcadence
8lifetime, all kinds
4of them subscriptions
1.076543credits retired, lifetime

Do something with this

  1. See the latest retirement

    The most recent EventRetire from this wallet, straight off regen-1.

    Open tx →
  2. See the burns, the other half of the same wallet

    REGEN bought and destroyed, tracked the same way, never added to this count.

    Open burn tracker →
  3. Retire through the same door yourself

    The board's compute lane counts your own retirements the same way once they land on chain.

    Open the Regen baseline →

What we found

Counted regen.ecocredit.v1.EventRetire events whose owner is regen13hdw80n5c9yueg4mgvap82v2dcsl8dq50j00dh, the master wallet named in Regen Compute's own accounting spec. 8 retirements across 3 credit batches: 4 paid subscriptions and 4 of the team's own labeled test runs. 6 came through a marketplace purchase with auto-retire and 2 through a direct retire message.

Why the typed event and not the message. message.action='/regen.ecocredit.v1.MsgRetire' AND message.sender=<wallet> returns only the direct retirements (2 of 8 on 2026-09-03); a MsgBuyDirect auto-retire emits EventRetire without a second top-level message.
Three sources agree: primary node https://rpc-regen.ecostake.com (retention floor 25,498,036) reports 8 transactions; secondary node http://public-rpc.regen.vitwit.com:26657 (floor 25,277,882) reports 8; the registry indexer reports 8. A node pruned past the earliest retirement answers a clean, wrong zero, so this page refuses to build unless every floor sits below height 25,800,000 and the three record sets match.
datecreditsbatchkindreason (on-chain)howtx
2026-05-20 0.001 BT01-001-20210309-20231212-001 dev test Verify abbreviation fix: was failing before c6236df→7957633 direct retire ce9e4a876e…
2026-05-07 0.001 C02-004-20210102-20211207-001 dev test Verify post-deploy: class_id + lowercase tx_hash purchase, auto-retire 16b8c7df51…
2026-05-07 0.001 C02-004-20210102-20211207-001 dev test Schema verification test for CROSSLUCID: Regen Compute integration discovery purchase, auto-retire 9eb152da5b…
2026-03-12 0.046426 USS01-002-20230901-20241231-001 subscription Regenerative Compute subscription: subscriber #5 (regen1wd0rsnftg4c7tf99pjhldymyd4dggmwmnj84sp) purchase, auto-retire 1820cad9d8…
2026-03-12 0.009039 USS01-002-20230901-20241231-001 subscription Regenerative Compute subscription: subscriber #3 (regen1vqrvsdn6usryjmg2qwyjzy55tdfky744c5wrnx) purchase, auto-retire fd7d48f2e5…
2026-03-12 0.009039 USS01-002-20230901-20241231-001 subscription Regenerative Compute subscription: subscriber #3 (regen1vqrvsdn6usryjmg2qwyjzy55tdfky744c5wrnx) purchase, auto-retire 727844c66c…
2026-03-12 0.009039 USS01-002-20230901-20241231-001 subscription Regenerative Compute subscription: subscriber #3 (regen1vqrvsdn6usryjmg2qwyjzy55tdfky744c5wrnx) purchase, auto-retire 6448c2ef2c…
2026-03-03 1 BT01-001-20210309-20231212-001 dev test Test retirement - regen-compute MCP server validation direct retire 20d2ef26f6…

Trend: stalled (quiet longer than its own worst historical gap)

Gaps between successive retirements, oldest pair first: 9d → 0h → 3h → 3h → 56d → 1h → 12d. The last one was 116 days ago (2026-05-20). Trailing 30 days: 0; trailing 90 days: 0, which is 0 a day. A lifetime average would smooth over a quiet quarter, so this page never states one.

Reconciling against the program's own figure

regen-compute ACCOUNTING-SPEC.md, section 6, Current Production Data Snapshot (as of 2026-03-14) states 19 retirements by 2026-03-14. On chain by that date: 5.

Why they differ. a count of rows in the program's subscriber_retirements billing table (execution attempts), not on-chain EventRetire events; the spec's own known-issues list documents zero-credit attempts among them. The two figures answer different questions (attempted vs settled on chain) and are not in conflict. This page states only the on-chain count.

Verify it yourself

Nothing here is asserted on our own authority. Every number is re-derivable from these public calls.

curl "https://rpc-regen.ecostake.com/tx_search?query=%22regen.ecocredit.v1.EventRetire.owner%3D'%5C%22regen13hdw80n5c9yueg4mgvap82v2dcsl8dq50j00dh%5C%22'%22&per_page=100"
curl -X POST https://api.regen.network/indexer/v1/graphql -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"query":"{ allRetirements(condition:{owner:\"regen13hdw80n5c9yueg4mgvap82v2dcsl8dq50j00dh\"}) { totalCount nodes { amount batchDenom jurisdiction owner reason timestamp blockHeight txHash } } }"}'
Provisioned by EcoWealth · this page carries a provisioning seal