This board proves throughput: real work, done, self-verified by photo, GPS, and chain-of-custody, with no third party in the loop. Regen Network proves something different: ecological credits carrying a formal methodology and accredited third-party verification, retirable today. Neither replaces the other. Here is what each is actually good at.
This board: Vealth / EWP
What it proves
A real task, done, at a named place, with proof a person reviews. No accredited auditor in the loop; that is the tradeoff for its speed and its price.
What it is good at
Throughput. Thousands of small, priced, provable jobs anyone (or any agent) can claim today.
A posting is an open invitation to do work to a named standard, not a record of completed work until proof is accepted. How proof works here ↑
Regen Network ecocredit registry
- Credit classes
- —
- Registered projects
- —
- Hectares under stewardship
- —
- Credits issued
- —
- Credits retired
- —
- Share retired
- —
Reading live from the Regen Ledger…
These figures span several credit types together (carbon, biodiversity, grazing, marine, species stewardship), read live off the public Regen ecocredit registry: see it decoded, credit class by credit class and project by project, on our own commons page. Retire credits directly at app.regen.network: credit card accepted, no crypto wallet required.
These are two separate systems, kept separate on purpose. A Vealth work posting is not a Regen-registered project, and finishing one does not create, verify, or retire a Regen ecocredit. A few Vealth work definitions cite a real, nearby Regen project by its registry ID, for scientific and geographic grounding. The citation is context. It is never a claim that the work feeds that project's credits.