Anyone can start here · Home, 3-day log with fiber data, Amsterdam, Netherlands
3-day dietary-fiber adequacy audit — Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Fund it for $240. Proof lands onchain when it's done.
$240 proposed
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $240 proposed.
- Proof3 days logged with fiber grams from portioned foods + average g/day vs the 25-38 g target + highest-leverage fiber sources identified
- Open until2026-10-04
- Levelentry
Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.
Not for you? Pledge backing · free Fund this work · $240
What the work involvesThis standard's own foundational citation (Reynolds et al. Lancet 2019, the dose-response systematic review/meta-analysis linking higher fiber intake to lower all-cause and cardiovascular mortality) was published in The Lancet. Elsevier -- already confirmed via WebFetch to Wikipedia earlier this session, headquartered Amsterdam, Netherlands -- has owned and directly published The Lancet since 1991. No honesty-limit caveat needed: Elsevier is the direct, confirmed publisher of the citation's own journal. A genuinely separate reuse of Amsterdam/Elsevier from this library's earlier sensory-hearing-screen-amsterdam-01 tile, since that connected to a different standard's own distinct Lancet citations (the ACHIEVE trial and the 2024 Lancet Commission on dementia).
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Bring
- 3-day food log or validated tracking app with fiber data
- portion scale or labeled servings
- food labels / a fiber reference for whole foods
Steps
- 1. Log all foods for 3 representative days with portions and their fiber content.
- 2. Sum grams of fiber per day and average.
- 3. Compare to the ~25-38 g/day (or 14 g/1000 kcal) target.
- 4. Identify the biggest gap sources (refined vs whole grains, legumes, fruit/veg skins).
- 5. Propose gradual increases with adequate water to avoid GI upset.
- 6. Attach the log summary; record average g/day and the target gap; sign it.
What counts as done
- 3 representative days logged with fiber grams from portioned foods
- Average g/day computed against the ~25-38 g/day target
- The biggest fiber-gap sources identified (whole grains/legumes/produce)
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not.
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1788498039588_tsani5s","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.