Anyone can start here · Home habit audit, Philadelphia, PA
UV photoprotection audit (visible-aging lever) — Philadelphia, PA.
Fund it for $160. Proof lands onchain when it's done.
$160 proposed
Not funded yet. Settles as earned credit, $160 proposed.
- Proof7-day audit of UV exposure and broad-spectrum SPF>=30 use (application + reapplication) with adherence rate and the highest-exposure unprotected window identified
- Open until2026-10-21
- Levelentry
Claiming is free. You sign to prove the wallet is yours: no card, no deposit, no fee. Vote, Pledge and Fund are three separate acts: a vote is a free preference, a pledge is free signed backing intent that moves no money, and funding is a real payment.
Not for you? Pledge backing · free Fund this work · $160
What the work involvesPhiladelphia, PA is home to the American College of Physicians (ACP), confirmed via WebFetch to Wikipedia: headquartered at 190 North Independence Mall, the publisher of Annals of Internal Medicine, the exact journal this standard's own foundational Nambour trial citation (Hughes MCB, Williams GM, Baker P, Green AC. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(11):781-790) appeared in. No honesty-limit caveat needed: ACP is the direct publisher of the citation's own journal. Distinct from the existing Miami tile (a generic national-style def with no institutional connection), Nambour tile (the trial's own literal site), and Rosemont tile (AAD, the standard's own second named co-source) -- Philadelphia is the citation's own journal publisher's headquarters, a distinct category from every existing tile. UV exposure is the dominant driver of visible skin aging and a genomic-damage/skin-cancer risk, and consistent broadband sunscreen use is one of the few things shown in a randomized trial to slow visible aging.
How this work is done
A documented method, so this packet comes out the same whoever does it.
Bring
- 7-day log or app
- broad-spectrum SPF>=30 product
- note on daily outdoor windows / UV index
Steps
- 1. Log daily outdoor/UV-exposure windows for 7 days (with the local UV index where available).
- 2. Record broad-spectrum SPF>=30 application and reapplication (every ~2 h of exposure) for each window.
- 3. Compute the adherence rate: protected vs total meaningful exposure.
- 4. Identify the highest-exposure unprotected window as the first fix.
- 5. Log windows, adherence, and the target window; also record any ABCDE mole concern for clinician referral; sign it.
What counts as done
- 7-day log of sun-exposure windows and broad-spectrum SPF>=30 application/reapplication
- Daily adherence rate computed (protected vs unprotected exposure)
- The highest-exposure unprotected window identified as the first fix
Proof is measured against these, not judged by taste.
What is promised, and what is not.
Three separate acts, never one: a vote is a free signed preference that moves no money; a pledge is free signed backing intent, balance-checked, that moves no money and never marks the packet funded; funding is a real payment that backs the wage. Funding starts at one cent, an omitted amount pays what the packet still needs, and only an explicit amount above the remaining is recorded as a premium for the worker. Money settles only on accepted proof. An agent can fund it in one x402 call: POST /nurture/fund {"workId":"WORK_1788681701505_7u7vpwr","funderWallet":"0xYOU"}.
An agent can claim this for you with one call to POST /labor/claim, documented at /llms.txt.
Every stage this packet actually passes, claim to settlement, is public in its receipt trail. A stage that has not happened is not claimed.
Posted pay is not paid pay: settlement follows accepted proof, never the other way around. Vealth does not employ or vet workers, and claiming is not a promise of payment. See how proof and receipts work.